Experiences of simulated patients in providing feedback in communication skills teaching for undergraduate medical students
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Riya Elizabeth George1, Harvey Wells2, Annie Cushing2
1Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Robin Brook Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, EC1A 7BE, UK. r.george@qmul.ac.uk.
Background:
Simulated Patients (SPs) are commonplace in the teaching of communication skills in medical education and can provide immediate feedback to students from the patient's perspective. The experiences of SPs and their perspective on providing feedback is an under-studied area. This study aims to explore SP experiences and views on feedback, factors influencing their feedback and implications for training.
Methods:
Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we conducted six focus groups with 30 SPs. Participants included experienced simulated patients from a London-based actor agency, used in undergraduate teaching programmes of communication skills. Consistent with the principles of grounded theory, data was collected and analysed in an iterative process to identify themes.
Results:
Five over-arching themes were identified: 1.) Feedback processes, 2.) Challenges in providing feedback, 3.) Cumulative experiences, 4.) Web of interpersonal relationships and dynamics and 5.) Portraying the character and patient representations.
Discussion:
These SPs regarded the sharing of the emotions they experienced during the consultation as the focus of their feedback. Their preference was for giving a 'sandwich style' of feedback and 'out-of-role' approach. The relationship with facilitators and students and politeness conventions emerged as significant factors when providing feedback. Sensitivity to the social dynamics of groups and implicit facilitator expectations were challenges they experienced as was divergence in views of student performance.
Conclusion:
This study explored SP experiences and perspectives on providing feedback. Findings reveal complex social and structural dynamics at play in providing feedback which have not been reported so far in the literature. It is recommended that these issues should be addressed in training of both SPs and facilitators, in addition to feedback guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Feedback Inhibition

