Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Intracoronary pharmacological therapy versus aspiration thrombectomy in STEMI (IPAT-STEMI): A systematic review and
Rasha Kaddoura1, Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim2, Daoud Al-Badriyeh2
1Pharmacy Department, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Insights
Intracoronary thrombolytics significantly improve myocardial perfusion and reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients compared to aspiration thrombectomy. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors showed no significant benefit.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Thrombosis Management
Background:
- High thrombus burden in STEMI patients complicates treatment and worsens outcomes.
- Effective strategies are needed to reduce thrombus load and improve myocardial reperfusion.
- Current approaches include aspiration thrombectomy and pharmacological interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of intracoronary thrombolytics or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) versus aspiration thrombectomy (AT) as adjuncts to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI patients.
- To evaluate procedural and clinical outcomes associated with these interventions.
- To determine the optimal strategy for managing thrombus burden in STEMI.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary thrombolytics/GPI with AT in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.
- Literature search conducted across multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL).
- Primary outcomes included procedural success measures like TIMI flow grade 3, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) 3, Myocardial blush grade (MBG) 2/3, and ST-segment resolution (STR).
Main Results:
- Twelve trials with 1,466 patients were analyzed.
- Intracoronary thrombolytics significantly improved TIMI flow grade 3, complete ST-segment resolution, and TMPG 3.
- Thrombolytics also significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) without increasing bleeding risk.
- Intracoronary GPI did not improve procedural or clinical outcomes compared to AT.
Conclusions:
- Intracoronary thrombolytics are superior to aspiration thrombectomy in improving myocardial perfusion and reducing MACE in STEMI patients.
- Aspiration thrombectomy and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors did not demonstrate significant benefits over thrombolytics.
- Thrombolytics represent a valuable therapeutic option for managing thrombus burden in STEMI.
Background:
Thrombus load in STEMI patients remains a challenge in practice. It aggravates coronary obstruction leading to impaired myocardial perfusion, worsened cardiac function, and adverse clinical outcomes. Various strategies have been advocated to reduce thrombus burden.
Objectives:
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intracoronary-administered thrombolytics or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) in comparison with aspiration thrombectomy (AT) as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search for randomized trials that compared intracoronary-administered thrombolytics or GPI with AT in STEMI patients who underwent PCI, was conducted using various databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRALE). Primary outcome was procedural measures (e.g., TIMI flow grade 3, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) 3, Myocardial blush grade (MBG) 2/3, ST-segment resolution (STR)).
Results:
Twelve randomized trials enrolled 1,466 patients: 696 were randomized to intracoronary-administered pharmacological interventions and 553 to AT. Patients randomized to PCI alone were excluded. Thrombolytics significantly improved TIMI flow grade 3 (odds ratio = 3.71, 95% CI: 1.85-7.45), complete STR (odds ratio = 3.64, 95% CI: 1.60-8.26), and TMPG 3 (odds ratio = 5.31, 95% CI: 2.48-11.36). Thrombolytics significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (odds ratio = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.13-0.65) without increasing bleeding risk. Trial sequential analysis assessment confirmed the superiority of thrombolytics for the primary outcome. Intracoronary GPI, either alone or combined with AT, did not improve procedural or clinical outcomes.
Conclusions:
Compared with AT, intracoronary-administered thrombolytics significantly improved myocardial perfusion and MACE in STEMI patients.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
09:21Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management