Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026

Sampling and Pretreatment of Tooth Enamel Carbonate for Stable Carbon and Oxygen Isotope Analysis
Published on: August 15, 2018
A large-scale evaluation of intraperson isotopic variation within human bone collagen and bioapatite
Gregory E Berg1, Lesley A Chesson1, Jang Yuryang2
1Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) Laboratory, Building 4077, 590 Moffett St., Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, HI 96853, United States.
Abstract:
This study investigated intraperson skeletal (herein referred to as either "intraperson" or "intraskeletal") variation in stable isotope ratios for collagen (C and N) and bioapatite (C and O) extracted from five to six long bones from 27 modern individuals. The maximum intraperson variation observed for collagen was 0.78‰ for δ13Ccoll values and 1.12‰ for δ15Ncoll values, with a mean variation (± SD) of 0.33 ± 0.18‰ and 0.45 ± 0.27‰, respectively. For bioapatite, the maximum intraperson variation was 1.63‰ for δ13Cap values and 4.80‰ for δ18Oap values, with a mean variation (± SD) of 0.81 ± 0.32‰ and 1.00 ± 1.03‰, respectively. These results generally agree with previously reported data on intraskeletal isotopic variation. Using a two- and three-standard-deviations-from-the-mean model with analytical quality control data included, it is proposed that two bones with differing collagen δ13Ccoll values greater than 0.75‰ are probably from different individuals, and those that have differing values greater than 0.95‰ are from different individuals. Likewise, differing collagen δ15Ncoll values greater than 1.05‰ are probably different, and greater than 1.35‰ are different. For bioapatite, the proposed values change to 1.55‰ and 1.90‰ for δ13Cap, respectively; for δ18Oap values no limits were set due to the unexpectedly large variation found in the study population. We highly encourage researchers to use extreme caution when interpreting δ18O values from bone apatite. We also note that these parameters were evaluated on modern samples and therefore may not reflect intraperson variation in past societies. Finally, we demonstrate application of these interpretative limits to sort commingled human remains cases.
More Related Videos
07:10A Sectioning, Coring, and Image Processing Guide for High-Throughput Cortical Bone Sample Procurement and Analysis for Synchrotron Micro-CT
Published on: June 12, 2020
07:29Author Spotlight: Advanced Techniques for Characterizing Tissue Mineralization in Bone Regeneration Research
Published on: September 27, 2024