Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Predictive validity of the HCR-20V3 in a sample of Australian forensic psychiatric patients
Delene M Brookstein1,2, Michael Daffern1,2, James R P Ogloff1,2
1Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Alphington, VIC, Australia.
Abstract:
The Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 Version 3 is the latest iteration in the HCR-20 series, adopting novel changes such as the addition of Relevance ratings and non-requirement to include the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. This study aimed to examine these changes and compare the predictive validity of the HCR-20V3 to the HCR-20V2. The sample comprised of 100 forensic psychiatric patients, retrospectively followed up for a maximum period of approximately 13 years post-discharge from the Thomas Embling Hospital. Recidivism data were sourced from official police records. Results indicated good to excellent inter-rater reliability. The HCR-20V3 significantly predicted violent recidivism (area under the curve = .70 to .77), levels of accuracy that were not significantly different from the HCR-20V2. HCR-20V3 Relevance ratings failed to add incremental validity above Presence ratings; however, the PCL-R improved upon the HCR-20V3's validity. The study represented one of the first evaluations of the HCR-20V3 in Australia.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)

