Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2025

06:05
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
1.4K
The Impact of a 22-Month Multistep Implementation Program on Speaking-Up Behavior in an Academic Anesthesia
Fabio Walther1, Carl Schick1, David Schwappach
1From the Department of Anaesthesiology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden.
Journal of Patient Safety
|May 9, 2022
Summary
Implementing a multimodal program significantly improved speaking-up behaviors and safety culture in healthcare. This sustained approach is key to enhancing patient safety through effective assertive communication.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare quality improvement
- Patient safety research
- Organizational behavior in medicine
Background:
- Speaking-up, a form of assertive communication, is vital for enhancing patient safety but faces significant barriers.
- Existing interventions for promoting speaking-up have shown variable success, highlighting the need for comprehensive, sustained strategies.
- A multimodal and sustained approach is crucial for fostering behavioral and cultural changes necessary for safer healthcare environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a 22-month multimodal program designed to establish and strengthen speaking-up behaviors within a healthcare institution.
- To assess changes in perceived safety culture before and after the implementation of the speaking-up program.
- To compare the institution's speaking-up and assertive communication levels against a national benchmark.
Main Methods:
- A 22-month multistep program was implemented to foster speaking-up.
- The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was administered pre- and post-program to assess safety culture.
- The Speaking-up About Patient Safety Questionnaire was used to compare institutional performance against a Swiss benchmark.
Main Results:
- Post-program SAQ scores significantly improved in 2 of 3 relevant questions (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.002).
- The institution's composite score on the Speaking-up About Patient Safety Questionnaire was significantly higher than the benchmark (P < 0.001).
- These findings indicate a successful enhancement of speaking-up and assertive communication.
Conclusions:
- The long-term, multimodal speaking-up program was successfully implemented, leading to improved safety attitudes and climate.
- Post-program assessments revealed higher levels of assertive communication and speaking-up compared to benchmarks.
- The study validates the necessity of multimodal programs and sustained efforts for strengthening speaking-up and improving healthcare safety.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Implementation
5.4K
Implementation is the execution of the nursing care plan developed during the planning phase.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
5.4K
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
4.8K
SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
4.8K
Obedience
33.1K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
33.1K

