Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Carbon Cycle

The Carbon Cycle

Carbon is the basis of all organic matter on Earth, and is recycled through the ecosystem in two primary processes: one in which carbon is exchanged among living organisms, and one in which carbon is cycled over long periods of time through fossilized organic remains, weathering of rocks, and volcanic activity. Human activities, including increased agricultural practices and the burning of fossil fuels, has greatly affected the balance of the natural carbon cycle.

Trophic Efficiency

Trophic Efficiency

Trophic level transfer efficiency (TLTE) is a measure of the total energy transfer from one trophic level to the next. Due to extensive energy loss as metabolic heat, an average of only 10% of the original energy obtained is passed on to the next level. This pattern of energy loss severely limits the possible number of trophic levels in a food chain.

Carbon-dioxide Fixation

Carbon-dioxide Fixation

Carbon dioxide fixation in prokaryotes enables the assimilation of inorganic carbon into organic molecules, supporting biosynthetic pathways, sustaining ecosystems, and contributing to the global carbon cycle. It also has industrial applications in carbon capture and bioproduct synthesis. Autotrophic organisms rely on this process to utilize CO₂ as a carbon source in diverse environments.The Calvin CycleThe Calvin cycle is the most widespread carbon fixation mechanism, primarily used by...

The Calvin Benson Cycle

The Calvin Benson Cycle

Ribulose 1,5- bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCo) is a critical enzyme that catalyzes carbon dioxide assimilation during photosynthesis. However, it is an inefficient enzyme, having an extremely slow catalytic rate. A typical enzyme can process about a thousand molecules per second; however, RuBisCo fixes only around three-carbon dioxides per second. Photosynthetic cells compensate for this slow rate by synthesizing very high amounts of RuBisCo, making it the most abundant single...

Limits to Natural Selection

Limits to Natural Selection

Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.

Limiting Reactant

Limiting Reactant

The relative amounts of reactants and products represented in a balanced chemical equation are often referred to as stoichiometric amounts. However, in reality, the reactants are not always present in the stoichiometric amounts indicated by the balanced equation.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Adaptation and Response in Drylands: A Dryland Research Agenda and Campaign Strategy.

Global change biology·2026

Same author

An overview of the NASA Adaptation and Response in Drylands field experiment scoping study.

Cambridge prisms. Drylands·2026

Same author

Vegetation responses to air dryness amplify future land surface warming.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Leaf temperature and its departure from ambient air temperature.

Nature plants·2026

Same author

Pantropical moist forests are converging towards a middle leaf longevity.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Event-Specific Meteorological Drivers Shape Diverse Water-Use Efficiency Trajectories Under Drought Propagation.

Global change biology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites

Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites

Published on: June 24, 2019

The limits of forest carbon sequestration.

Julia K Green¹, Trevor F Keenan^1,2

¹Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Science (New York, N.Y.)

|May 13, 2022

Summary

Forest models might overestimate carbon sequestration. This research suggests current estimates of forest carbon storage potential may be too high, impacting climate change mitigation strategies.

More Related Videos

Utilizing Soil Density Fractionation to Separate Distinct Soil Carbon Pools

Utilizing Soil Density Fractionation to Separate Distinct Soil Carbon Pools

Published on: December 16, 2022

Monitoring Pedogenic Inorganic Carbon Accumulation Due to Weathering of Amended Silicate Minerals in Agricultural Soils.

Monitoring Pedogenic Inorganic Carbon Accumulation Due to Weathering of Amended Silicate Minerals in Agricultural Soils.

Published on: June 4, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites

Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites

Published on: June 24, 2019

Utilizing Soil Density Fractionation to Separate Distinct Soil Carbon Pools

Utilizing Soil Density Fractionation to Separate Distinct Soil Carbon Pools

Published on: December 16, 2022

Monitoring Pedogenic Inorganic Carbon Accumulation Due to Weathering of Amended Silicate Minerals in Agricultural Soils.

Monitoring Pedogenic Inorganic Carbon Accumulation Due to Weathering of Amended Silicate Minerals in Agricultural Soils.

Published on: June 4, 2021

Area of Science:

Forestry science
Climate change research
Ecosystem modeling

Background:

Forests play a crucial role in global carbon cycling.
Accurate estimation of forest carbon sequestration is vital for climate change mitigation.
Existing models are widely used but may contain inherent biases.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the accuracy of current forest carbon sequestration models.
To identify potential overestimation in forest sequestration potential.
To inform more realistic climate change mitigation strategies.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of multiple forest carbon models.
Review of empirical data on forest carbon storage.
Statistical assessment of model performance against real-world data.

Main Results:

Current models frequently overestimate the actual carbon sequestration capacity of forests.
Discrepancies were observed across various forest types and geographical regions.
Model parameters may not fully account for limiting factors in sequestration.

Conclusions:

Forest sequestration potential may be lower than currently projected by models.
Revising existing models is necessary for accurate climate policy development.
Further research is needed to refine sequestration estimates and understand limiting factors.