Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

15.5K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
15.5K
Controls in Experiments01:13

Controls in Experiments

13.1K
When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...
13.1K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.3K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.3K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.0K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.0K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

28.4K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
28.4K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.4K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leader and subordinate perceptions impact different elements of safety reporting.

International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE·2025
Same author

Positive impact of sunlight exposure on mental health in a naval population.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2024
Same author

Organizational caring as a predictor of good mental health in an operational naval environment.

Psychological services·2023
Same author

Selecting senior leaders in the public sector: Challenges and best practices.

Psychological services·2023
Same author

The role of inhibitory control in shoot/don't-shoot decisions.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2021
Same author

How Asymptomatic Transmission Influences Mitigation and Suppression Strategies during a Pandemic.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2021
Same journal

Shared intentionality and attachment theories in WILD and WEIRD contexts.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Constructing an architecture for a decolonized developmental science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Go WILD, but mind the gap.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILDing the study of developmental trajectories in navigation and wayfinding: Progress and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILD kids, cutting-edge research. Enhancing diversity and reflexivity in psychology.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Ethnographic methods can help psychology overcome its WEIRD problems.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 23, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K

The missing consequences: A fourth flaw of experiments.

Adam Thomas Biggs1

  • 1Naval Special Warfare Command, Coronado, CA 92155, USA. adam.t.biggs.mil@socom.mil.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|May 13, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decision-making is heavily influenced by potential consequences, a factor often ignored in experiments. This oversight is critical in high-stakes situations like lethal force encounters, where outcomes depend on timely, correct decisions.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.3K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 23, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.3K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Decision-making science
  • Behavioral economics

Background:

  • Decision-making processes are influenced by anticipated outcomes.
  • Laboratory experiments may not accurately reflect real-world decision-making due to overlooking prospective influences.
  • The impact of consequences on decisions is a critical, yet often neglected, factor in research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the oversight of prospective influences in decision-making experiments.
  • To question the validity of certain laboratory paradigms in light of this flaw.
  • To emphasize the importance of considering consequences in decision-making research, particularly in high-stakes scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • The study reviews existing literature on decision-making.
  • It analyzes the limitations of traditional experimental designs.
  • It uses lethal force encounters as a case study to illustrate the problem.

Main Results:

  • Prospective consequences significantly affect decision-making.
  • Current experimental paradigms may fail to capture the full scope of decision-making behavior.
  • The negative outcomes of poor decisions in critical situations are often underestimated in research.

Conclusions:

  • Experimental designs must incorporate the prospective influence of consequences.
  • Laboratory paradigms need re-evaluation to better reflect real-world decision-making.
  • Understanding the impact of consequences is crucial for accurate decision-making models, especially in critical incidents.