Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
Published on: September 18, 2021
Detecting signatures of selection on gene expression
Peter D Price1, Daniela H Palmer Droguett2,3, Jessica A Taylor2,4
1Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. pprice3@sheffield.ac.uk.
Abstract:
A substantial amount of phenotypic diversity results from changes in gene expression levels and patterns. Understanding how the transcriptome evolves is therefore a key priority in identifying mechanisms of adaptive change. However, in contrast to powerful models of sequence evolution, we lack a consensus model of gene expression evolution. Furthermore, recent work has shown that many of the comparative approaches used to study gene expression are subject to biases that can lead to false signatures of selection. Here we first outline the main approaches for describing expression evolution and their inherent biases. Next, we bridge the gap between the fields of phylogenetic comparative methods and transcriptomics to reinforce the main pitfalls of inferring selection on expression patterns and use simulation studies to show that shifts in tissue composition can heavily bias inferences of selection. We close by highlighting the multi-dimensional nature of transcriptional variation and identifying major unanswered questions in disentangling how selection acts on the transcriptome.
Related Concept Videos
DNA Microarrays
Ribosome Profiling
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique...

