Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

1.4K
Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
1.4K
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

5.3K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
5.3K
In-vitro Mutagenesis01:16

In-vitro Mutagenesis

14.4K
To learn more about the function of a gene, researchers can observe what happens when the gene is inactivated or “knocked out,” by creating genetically engineered knockout animals. Knockout mice have been particularly useful as models for human diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.
14.4K
Mouse Models of Cancer Study02:43

Mouse Models of Cancer Study

5.7K
Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Meis1 isoform diversity orchestrates neural progenitor differentiation by regulating ATOH1 degradation at distinct subcellular compartments.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Evaluation of applicability of the repeated-dose liver micronucleus assay in rats initiated at8weeks of age as in vivo genotoxicity assessment for 2,6-dninitrotoluene (2,6-DNT), a compound with reported cytostatic potential.

Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis·2026
Same author

WT1 mRNA in peripheral blood enables early prognostic stratification in AML patients receiving venetoclax and azacitidine therapy.

Annals of hematology·2026
Same author

Creating an engine of scientific discovery, an Indo-Japan perspective: learnings from IJNTC 2025 workshop.

NPJ systems biology and applications·2026
Same author

In vitro and preclinical assessment of drug interactions between fluoroquinolones and a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug predicting risk of seizure.

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology·2026
Same author

Potential for Computational Genotoxicity: A Report on Symposium 3 of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen and Genome Society (JEMS), 2024.

Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K

Optimizing machine-learning models for mutagenicity prediction through better feature selection.

Nicolas K Shinada1, Naoki Koyama2, Megumi Ikemori3

  • 1SBX Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

Mutagenesis
|May 13, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning models can predict compound mutagenicity, improving drug discovery. Selecting optimal molecular features significantly enhances prediction accuracy, outperforming existing methods.

Keywords:
machine learningmutagenicitymutagenicity prediction

More Related Videos

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System
07:08

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

Published on: April 26, 2018

8.0K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K
The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System
07:08

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

Published on: April 26, 2018

8.0K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Toxicology
  • Machine learning in drug discovery

Background:

  • Traditional mutagenicity tests are costly and time-consuming.
  • In silico methods offer a more efficient alternative for predicting compound mutagenicity.
  • Machine learning (ML) models show promise for improving mutagenicity prediction accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of feature selection on ML model accuracy for mutagenicity prediction.
  • To identify novel structural and molecular features that maximize predictive performance.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of combining diverse feature sets for enhanced accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic evaluation of novel structural and molecular features.
  • Training and rigorous assessment of multiple classification models, including deep neural networks.
  • Performance evaluation using 5- and 10-fold cross-validation on the Hansen et al. benchmark dataset.

Main Results:

  • The proposed approach, utilizing molecule structure, molecular properties, and structural alerts as features, achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93.
  • This performance surpasses state-of-the-art methods for mutagenicity prediction on the benchmark dataset.
  • Combining different feature sets demonstrably benefits model accuracy improvements.

Conclusions:

  • Optimized feature selection is crucial for enhancing the accuracy of machine learning models in mutagenicity prediction.
  • The developed framework provides a robust method for improving in silico mutagenicity assessments.
  • This approach has significant implications for accelerating drug discovery and development by enabling more reliable early-stage safety evaluations.