Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2026

Modeling an Enzyme Active Site using Molecular Visualization Freeware
Published on: December 25, 2021
KinEAGER: An Evidence-Aware Multitask Model with Calibrated Uncertainty for Enzyme Kinetics Prediction
Xinran Wang1, Wuruiyang Li2, Shuaiwen Ding3
1School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu730000, China.
Abstract:
Public enzyme-kinetics records have labels that are incomplete across tasks, assay conditions that vary across sources, and structure-associated evidence that is not uniformly available. Consequently, naive multimodal concatenation is limited, and scores from random splits are weak proxies for deployment performance. We present KinEAGER, an evidence-aware multitask framework that jointly predicts kcat and Km and analytically derives kcat/Km under missing modalities and distribution shift. KinEAGER combines frozen ESM-2 and MolT5 encoders, low-rank adapters (LoRA), cross-modal interaction layers, availability-aware soft gating, domain-by-task heteroscedastic training, and a kcat specialist engaged according to distance from the training distribution for out-of-distribution (OOD) queries; three independently trained models form a deep ensemble that supplies sample-level uncertainty. On a grouped enzyme-substrate split, kcat reaches a MAE of 0.719 (R2 = 0.542) and Km reaches a MAE of 0.722 (R2 = 0.737) in log10 units, with a macro-average MAE of 0.817. Under sequence-cluster OOD evaluation, KinEAGER achieves the lowest MAE among the locally evaluated models and approaches the performance reported for CatPred. Three-run ablations show a consistent pattern: the Full configuration gives the best overall performance, structure randomization causes the largest degradation in point prediction, domain-by-task uncertainty primarily improves NLL and coverage, and either physicochemical or structural evidence alone is weaker than the Full configuration. Prediction disagreement among the three independent models is positively correlated with absolute error (macro-average Spearman correlation 0.144). When ensemble disagreement is used as a split-conformal normalizer, validation-calibrated sample-adaptive intervals achieve empirical coverage of 0.903/0.951 at the nominal 90%/95% levels (Cov90/Cov95). Calibration degrades on new data sources, while a small target-source calibration set can restore coverage. A Nitrocefin assay on four beta-lactamases reproduces the predicted HIGH/LOW ranking, with KPC-family 0G8 exceeding the CTX-M-1 reference.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Enzyme Kinetics
The experimenter can then plot the initial reaction rate or velocity (Vo) of a given trial against the substrate concentration ([S]) to obtain a graph of the reaction properties. For many enzymatic reactions involving a...
Enzyme Kinetics
Scientists typically study enzyme kinetics with a fixed amount of enzyme in the controlled environment of a test tube. When more reactant, or substrate, is...
Determination of Michaelis Constant and Maximum Elimination Rate
These parameters can be estimated by analyzing plasma concentration data post-drug administration. A notable example of this application is phenytoin, a drug with capacity-limited kinetics. It's recommended that phenytoin should be administered at two...
Catalytically Perfect Enzymes
Induced-fit Model
Enzymes exhibit substrate specificity, meaning that they can only bind to certain substrates. This is mainly determined by the shape and chemical characteristics of...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.

