Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Machine learning-based algorithm demonstrates differences in del19 and L858R EGFR subgroups in non-small cell lung
Ullas Batra1, Shrinidhi Nathany2, Mansi Sharma1
1Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre New Delhi, India.
Background:
Exon del19 and L858R mutations account for 90% of EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). LUX lung 3 and 6 initially reported a survival difference between these two. However, other studies did not demonstrate the same. By using machine learning (ML), it is possible to discover novel patterns for cancer susceptibility, recurrence, prognostication, and therapy. We evaluate the effect of these two molecular subtypes on overall survival/progression-free survival (OS/PFS).
Methods:
413 patients with stage IV EGFR mutant NSCLC were analyzed for clinicopathologic features, treatment details, and survival outcome. PFS prediction models were built using ensemble decision trees, and random forest. Ensemble decision trees were built and validation was performed using survival analysis. Clustering regression techniques were then applied to train and test the prediction of the 1st PFS of patients.
Results:
The median age of the cohort was 59 years comprising 53% males and 47% females. 275 (66.5%) patients showed a del19 mutation type and 138 (33.5%) harbored L858R. After clustering, the most important variables were age (P<0.05), ECOG performance status (PS) (P<0.04), PDL1 (P<0.09), smoking status (P<0.01) and to a lesser extent, number of extrathoracic metastasis (ETM) sites (median 1.2, P<0.06), brain metastasis (P<0.06) and gender (P<0.08). The prediction for 1st PFS for del19 showed mean absolute error of 2.6 months and 4.72 months for L858R. The accuracy was 79.8% with 82% sensitivity, 79% specificity and AUC: 0.72. The precision was 92% with a Mathews correlation coefficient of 0.59.
Conclusion:
This study used machine learning modeling with fair accuracy to demonstrate that ECOG PS, age at diagnosis, and smoking status are the three main predictive factors of PFS in these patients.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
08:52Profiling Sensitivity to Targeted Therapies in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patient-Derived Organoids
Published on: November 22, 2021