Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Methods Development for Blood Borne Macrophage Carriage of Nanoformulated Antiretroviral Drugs
Published on: December 9, 2010
Developing Reporting Guidelines for Studies of HIV Drug Resistance Prevalence: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
Cristian Garcia1, Nadia Rehman1, Daeria O Lawson1
1Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Developing standardized reporting guidelines for HIV drug resistance studies is crucial for accurate prevalence estimates. This research established an expert-agreed checklist to improve data quality and global health surveillance.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Infectious Diseases
- Epidemiology
Background:
- HIV drug resistance poses a significant global health challenge, limiting the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy.
- Inconsistent and inadequate data reporting in HIV drug resistance studies compromises the accuracy and usability of prevalence estimates.
- Existing research indicates a low quality of reporting in HIV drug resistance prevalence studies, necessitating improved guidance for complete and uniform reporting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To contribute to the development of standardized reporting guidelines for prevalence studies of HIV drug resistance.
- To outline the methodology employed in creating a reporting item checklist for HIV drug resistance studies.
- To identify and report key insights on essential items for reporting in HIV drug resistance prevalence studies.
Main Methods:
- A sequential explanatory mixed methods study was conducted, involving authors and users of HIV drug resistance studies.
- The study comprised a quantitative phase (cross-sectional electronic survey) followed by a qualitative phase (focus group discussions).
- Reporting items were assessed for essentiality using content validity ratios, followed by expert revision and consensus in focus groups.
Main Results:
- Data collection was completed by November 2021, with 51 participants in the electronic survey and 9 participants in two focus group discussions.
- Analysis of survey data using content validity ratios informed the selection of items for focus group discussions.
- Thematic analysis of focus group discussions was performed to identify emergent themes related to the agreement process on reporting items.
Conclusions:
- This study successfully achieved expert consensus on essential reporting items for HIV drug resistance studies, supporting the development of a reporting checklist.
- The findings will be refined by a writing committee of experts and external reviewers to finalize comprehensive reporting guidelines.
- The established guidelines aim to enhance the quality, consistency, and comparability of HIV drug resistance prevalence data globally.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

