Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
The Effect of Outcome vs. Process Accountability-Focus on Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Ira Sharon1, Anat Drach-Zahavy1, Einav Srulovici1
1Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Background:
The foundation of a safe practice is accountability, especially outcome- rather than process-focused accountability, particularly during pandemics such as COVID-19. Accountability is an essential behavior that promotes congruence between nursing actions and standards associated with quality of care. Moreover, the scant research examining whether one accountability focus is superior in motivating humans to better task performance yields inconclusive results.
Aims:
Systematically examine the effect of an outcome- vs. process-accountability focus on performance and identify any moderating variables.
Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data Sources:
PsycINFO, Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases, with all publications to November 2020.
Review Methods:
A systematic search using Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed. Statistical analysis and forest plots were performed using MetaXL 5.3. Heterogeneity was presented using I2 statistics and Q tests, and possible publication bias was assessed with a Doi plot and the LFK index.
Results:
Seven studies representing nine experiments involving 1,080 participants were included. The pooled effect of the nine experiments on task performance failed to show significant differences (mean = -0.09; 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI]: -0.21, 0.03), but a significant moderating effect of task complexity was demonstrated. Specifically, outcome accountability exerts a beneficial effect in complex tasks (mean = -0.48 [95%CI: -0.62, -0.33]) whereas process accountability improves the performance in simpler tasks (mean = 0.96 [95%CI: 0.72, 1.20]).
Conclusion:
These findings demonstrated that accountability focus by itself cannot serve as a sole motivator of better performance, because task complexity moderates the link between accountability focus and task performance. Outcome accountability exerts a beneficial effect for more-complex tasks, whereas process accountability improves the performance of simpler tasks. These findings are crucial in nursing, where it is typically assumed that a focus on outcomes is more important than a focus on processes.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
01:52Regression Toward the Mean
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
02:05Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping