The evolution of disability language: Choosing terms to describe disability

Area of Science:

• Social Sciences
• Linguistics
• Disability Studies

Background:

• Academic scholarship on disability language has undergone significant evolution.
• Cultural shifts influence the dynamic nature of terminology used to describe disability.
• Diverse preferences exist among individuals with disabilities regarding self-identification and preferred terminology.

Purpose of the Study:

• To discuss the historical trajectory and evolution of disability language in academic contexts.
• To examine current trends and debates surrounding disability terminology.
• To propose recommendations for culturally informed language use in scholarly publications.

Main Methods:

• Literature review of disability language evolution.
• Analysis of current trends in academic discourse.
• Exploration of prescriptive guidance versus community preferences.

Main Results:

• Disability language is not static; it changes with cultural contexts and societal understanding.
• Tension exists between prescriptive editorial guidance (e.g., person-first language) and the varied preferences of people with disabilities.
• A need for open dialogue on culturally informed language choices in scholarly work is evident.

Conclusions:

• Scholarly publications should adopt a nuanced approach to disability language, acknowledging its evolving nature.
• Recommendations are provided for academic articles to foster inclusive and respectful communication.
• Promoting dialogue on disability terminology is crucial for aligning academic language with lived experiences.