Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
Reconciling Local Coupled Cluster with Multireference Approaches for Transition Metal Spin-State Energetics
Maria Drosou1, Christiana A Mitsopoulou1, Dimitrios A Pantazis2
1Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Zografou 15771, Greece.
Abstract:
Spin-state energetics of transition metal complexes remain one of the most challenging targets for electronic structure methods. Among single-reference wave function approaches, local correlation approximations to coupled cluster theory, most notably the domain-based local pair natural orbital (DLPNO) approach, hold the promise of bringing the accuracy of coupled cluster theory with single, double, and perturbative triple excitations, CCSD(T), to molecular systems of realistic size with acceptable computational cost. However, recent studies on spin-state energetics of iron-containing systems raised doubts about the ability of the DLPNO approach to adequately and systematically approximate energetics obtained by the reference-quality complete active space second-order perturbation theory with coupled-cluster semicore correlation, CASPT2/CC. Here, we revisit this problem using a diverse set of iron complexes and examine several aspects of the application of the DLPNO approach. We show that DLPNO-CCSD(T) can accurately reproduce both CASPT2/CC and canonical CCSD(T) results if two basic principles are followed. These include the consistent use of the improved iterative (T1) versus the semicanonical perturbative triple corrections and, most importantly, a simple two-point extrapolation to the PNO space limit. The latter practically eliminates errors arising from the default truncation of electron-pair correlation spaces and should be viewed as standard practice in applications of the method to transition metal spin-state energetics. Our results show that reference-quality results can be readily achieved with DLPNO-CCSD(T) if these principles are followed. This is important also in view of the applicability of the method to larger single-reference systems and multinuclear clusters, whose treatment of dynamic correlation would be challenging for multireference-based approaches.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...

