Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
Published on: October 6, 2023
Inter-observer evaluation of a GPU-based multicriteria optimization algorithm combined with plan navigation tools for
Cédric Bélanger1, Éric Poulin2, Sylviane Aubin2
1Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique et Centre de recherche sur le cancer de l'Université Laval, CHU de Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada; Département de radio-oncologie et Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Purpose:
Recently, a GPU-based multicriteria optimization (gMCO) algorithm was integrated in a graphical user interface (gMCO-GUI) that allowed real-time plan navigation through a set of Pareto-optimal plans for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. This work reports on the inter-observer evaluation of the gMCO algorithm into the clinical workflow.
Methods And Materials:
Twenty HDR brachytherapy prostate cancer patients were retrospectively replanned with the gMCO algorithm. The reference clinical plans were each generated by experienced physicists using inverse planning followed by graphical optimization and approved by a radiation oncologist (RO). Each case was replanned with the gMCO algorithm by generating 2000 Pareto-optimal plans with four different objective functions. Two physicists were asked to rank the objective functions according to their preferences by choosing one preferred plan for each plans pool and ranking them using gMCO-GUI. The optimized dwell positions and dwell times of the gMCO plans that were ranked first were exported to Oncentra Prostate where a blinded comparison of the gMCO plans with the clinical plans was conducted by three ROs.
Results:
The median planning time of the two physicists was 9 min. Both physicists preferred the objective function with target sub-regions to cover specific target regions. Regarding the blinded comparison, the gMCO plans were preferred 19, 17, and 12 times by the three ROs, in which eight gMCO plans were unanimously preferred compared with the clinical plans.
Conclusions:
The plan quality and the planning time were similar between the two physicists and within what is observed in the clinic. Moreover, the gMCO plans evaluated favorably by ROs compared to the reference clinical plans.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019