Determination of Slow-Binding HDAC Inhibitor Potency and Subclass Selectivity
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Examination of Proteins Bound to Nascent DNA in Mammalian Cells Using BrdU-ChIP-Slot-Western Technique
Published on: January 14, 2016
Carlos Moreno-Yruela1, Christian A Olsen1
1Center for Biopharmaceuticals and Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract:
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) 1-3 regulate chromatin structure and gene expression. These three enzymes are targets for cancer chemotherapy and have been studied for the treatment of immune disorders and neurodegeneration, but there is a lack of selective pharmacological tool compounds to unravel their individual roles. Potent inhibitors of HDACs 1-3 often display slow-binding kinetics, which causes a delay in inhibitor-enzyme equilibration and may affect assay readout. Here we compare the potencies and selectivities of slow-binding inhibitors measured by discontinuous and continuous assays. We find that entinostat, a clinical candidate, inhibits HDACs 1-3 by a two-step slow-binding mechanism with lower potencies than previously reported. In addition, we show that RGFP966, commercialized as an HDAC3-selective probe, is a slow-binding inhibitor with inhibitor constants of 57, 31, and 13 nM against HDACs 1-3, respectively. These data highlight the need for thorough kinetic investigation in the development of selective HDAC probes.

