Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Serial and parallel processing in multitasking: Concepts and the impact of interindividual differences on task and
Jovita Brüning1, Valentin Koob2, Dietrich Manzey1
1Department of Psychology and Ergonomics.
Individuals preferring overlapping task processing show less interference during response selection. This finding suggests a link between task-level processing style and stage-level multitasking vulnerability.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human Multitasking Research
Background:
- Multitasking research explores parallel processing, with distinct task-level and stage-level perspectives.
- These perspectives, focusing on complete tasks versus specific processing stages, have largely developed independently.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between individual task-level processing preferences (overlapping vs. serial) and stage-level vulnerability to task interference.
- To determine if task processing style influences susceptibility to interference during response selection.
Main Methods:
- Assessed individual preferences for overlapping versus serial task processing using the task switching with preview (TSWP) paradigm.
- Measured vulnerability to task interference using the backward crosstalk effect (BCE) in a dual-task setting across two experiments.
Main Results:
- Individuals preferring overlapping task processing exhibited reduced vulnerability to task interference during response selection, evidenced by a smaller BCE.
- This effect was more pronounced in the second experiment, with a larger sample size and stimuli promoting bottom-up task separation.
Conclusions:
- Individual differences in task-level processing style are related to stage-level susceptibility to interference in multitasking.
- Findings suggest that a preference for overlapping task processing may confer resilience against response selection interference.
Related Concept Videos
Parallel Processing
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Information Processing Approach
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

