Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Linear time-invariant Systems01:23

Linear time-invariant Systems

468
A system is linear if it displays the characteristics of homogeneity and additivity, together termed the superposition property. This principle is fundamental in all linear systems. Linear time-invariant (LTI) systems include systems with linear elements and constant parameters.
The input-output behavior of an LTI system can be fully defined by its response to an impulsive excitation at its input. Once this impulse response is known, the system's reaction to any other input can be...
468
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

7.8K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
7.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

83.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
83.6K
Accuracy, limits, and approximation01:28

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

560
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
560
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

444
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
444
Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions01:10

Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions

138
When measuring distances in areas with physical obstructions, such as a lake in a field, surveyors must employ techniques to calculate accurate lengths without direct line measurements. One effective method is the offset technique, which allows for precise distance estimation over inaccessible stretches.In this scenario, a surveyor must measure a side of an area that crosses a lake. Since the measuring tape cannot span the lake, the surveyor begins by establishing a baseline that aligns with...
138

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Telephone Games: How Issues With Common Citation Practices Established the Inverse Efficiency Score.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same author

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Is multitasking efficient? Different metrics, different conclusions.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

An attempt to replicate action-effect learning and its generalization without stimulus-stimulus learning.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Ten years Diffusion Model for Conflict (DMC) tasks: Theoretical foundations, applications, practical recommendations, and open challenges.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Dual mechanisms of contextual cueing in immersive visual search.

Cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 22, 2025

A Novel Single Animal Motor Function Tracking System Using Simple, Readily Available Software
08:22

A Novel Single Animal Motor Function Tracking System Using Simple, Readily Available Software

Published on: August 31, 2018

6.7K

Same same but different: Subtle but consequential differences between two measures to linearly integrate speed and

Heinrich R Liesefeld1, Markus Janczyk2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 18, D-28359, Bremen, Germany. Heinrich.Liesefeld@uni-bremen.de.

Behavior Research Methods
|May 20, 2022
PubMed
Summary

The Balanced Integration Score (BIS) effectively controls for speed-accuracy trade-offs (SATs) in experimental psychology, unlike the Linear Integrated Speed-Accuracy Score (LISAS). This study clarifies their differences and validates BIS for within-participant designs.

Keywords:
Integration of errors and response timesMethods in experimental psychologyRepeated-measures designsSpeed–accuracy trade-off

More Related Videos

A Novel Approach to Overcome Movement Artifact When Using a Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging System for Alternating Speeds of Blood Microcirculation
07:20

A Novel Approach to Overcome Movement Artifact When Using a Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging System for Alternating Speeds of Blood Microcirculation

Published on: August 30, 2017

8.5K
Bio-layer Interferometry for Measuring Kinetics of Protein-protein Interactions and Allosteric Ligand Effects
13:57

Bio-layer Interferometry for Measuring Kinetics of Protein-protein Interactions and Allosteric Ligand Effects

Published on: February 18, 2014

29.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 22, 2025

A Novel Single Animal Motor Function Tracking System Using Simple, Readily Available Software
08:22

A Novel Single Animal Motor Function Tracking System Using Simple, Readily Available Software

Published on: August 31, 2018

6.7K
A Novel Approach to Overcome Movement Artifact When Using a Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging System for Alternating Speeds of Blood Microcirculation
07:20

A Novel Approach to Overcome Movement Artifact When Using a Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging System for Alternating Speeds of Blood Microcirculation

Published on: August 30, 2017

8.5K
Bio-layer Interferometry for Measuring Kinetics of Protein-protein Interactions and Allosteric Ligand Effects
13:57

Bio-layer Interferometry for Measuring Kinetics of Protein-protein Interactions and Allosteric Ligand Effects

Published on: February 18, 2014

29.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Psychometric methods
  • Experimental design

Background:

  • Speed-accuracy trade-offs (SATs) complicate the interpretation of experimental results in psychology.
  • Existing measures like the Linear Integrated Speed-Accuracy Score (LISAS) have limitations in controlling for SATs.
  • The Balanced Integration Score (BIS) was previously proposed as a superior measure for between-participants designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the critical differences between BIS and LISAS, particularly concerning their standardization variance.
  • To refute the hypothesis that design type (between- vs. within-participants) explains previous discrepancies.
  • To demonstrate the utility of BIS in within-participants designs and correct previous validation attempts.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of BIS and LISAS standardization methods.
  • Simulation studies to evaluate measure performance across different experimental designs.
  • Re-analysis of previous validation attempts for within-participants designs.

Main Results:

  • BIS and LISAS exhibit significant differences due to their distinct standardization variances.
  • The choice of standardization variance is crucial for accurately controlling SATs.
  • BIS is demonstrated to be effective in attenuating condition-specific SATs for within-participants designs.

Conclusions:

  • BIS offers a more robust method for integrating response time and accuracy data, especially when accounting for SATs.
  • The findings clarify the application and validation of BIS and LISAS, guiding researchers in selecting appropriate measures.
  • BIS is validated for use in within-participants designs, expanding its applicability in psychological research.