Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Evaluating the Role of Mitochondrial Function in Cancer-related Fatigue
Published on: May 17, 2018
Time to initiate randomized controlled clinical trials with methadone in cancer patients
1Medical Writing Service, Freiburg, 79117, Germany.
Abstract:
Public media coverage has fueled a demand for methadone as potential cure for cancer itself. Because patients have asked for respective prescriptions, clinical societies issued statements warning against the use of methadone as long as preclinical findings have not been supported by clinical evidence. In fact, not all preclinical data clearly support relevant effects. However, strong epidemiologic data suggest beneficial effects of methadone on cancer. Alternative explanations, namely better safety of methadone or hidden selection bias, seem less likely. This uncertainty can only be resolved by randomized controlled clinical trials. This review discusses all relevant data pertinent to methadone and cancer, uncovers supportive epidemiologic data, and suggests possible study designs.
Insights
Methadone shows potential benefits for cancer patients, despite limited clinical evidence. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to confirm its efficacy and safety as a cancer treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Public media has promoted methadone as a cancer cure, leading to patient demand.
- Clinical societies have cautioned against methadone use due to insufficient clinical evidence, despite some preclinical data.
- Epidemiologic data suggest potential benefits of methadone in cancer patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing data on methadone and cancer.
- To evaluate the evidence supporting methadone's role in cancer treatment.
- To propose future research directions, including clinical trial designs.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature review of preclinical and epidemiologic studies.
- Analysis of clinical society statements and patient-reported demand.
- Discussion of potential confounding factors and biases.
Main Results:
- Preclinical data on methadone's anti-cancer effects are inconsistent.
- Strong epidemiologic evidence suggests a potential benefit of methadone for cancer.
- Alternative explanations like improved safety or selection bias are less likely.
Conclusions:
- Randomized controlled clinical trials are essential to resolve the uncertainty surrounding methadone's efficacy in cancer.
- Further investigation is warranted to determine if methadone can be a viable cancer treatment option.
- Evidence suggests methadone may offer benefits, but robust clinical validation is required.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Phase II Reactions: Methylation Reactions
The mechanism of methylation unfolds in two stages. The first stage sees a methyltransferase enzyme facilitating the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the substrate, forming S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). The second stage involves further metabolism of SAH into homocysteine, which can be recycled...

