Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published on: January 3, 2020
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting the Entire Motor Network Does Not Increase Corticospinal
Joris Van der Cruijsen1,2, Zeb D Jonker1,3,4, Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou5,6
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Motor network transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) did not enhance corticospinal excitability more than conventional tDCS in healthy individuals. Both methods showed similar variability, challenging previous findings.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Neuromodulation
Background:
- Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used to modulate brain activity.
- Conventional tDCS targets the primary motor cortex, while motor network tDCS targets functionally connected regions.
- Previous studies suggested motor network tDCS may be more effective than conventional tDCS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of motor network tDCS and conventional tDCS on corticospinal excitability.
- To investigate if motor network tDCS offers superior enhancement of corticospinal excitability compared to conventional tDCS.
- To assess the variability in response to both tDCS protocols.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, single-blind, within-subject study was conducted with 21 healthy participants.
- Participants received motor network tDCS, 2 mA conventional tDCS, and sham tDCS.
- Corticospinal excitability was measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at various time points after stimulation.
Main Results:
- Neither motor network tDCS nor conventional tDCS significantly increased corticospinal excitability compared to sham stimulation.
- No evidence was found to support the superiority of motor network tDCS over conventional tDCS.
- Motor network tDCS exhibited similar susceptibility to inter- and intrasubject variability as conventional tDCS.
Conclusions:
- The findings do not support the enhanced efficacy of motor network tDCS over conventional tDCS for modulating corticospinal excitability.
- Both tDCS approaches appear to be subject to significant variability.
- Further research is needed to understand the factors influencing tDCS efficacy and variability.
More Related Videos
13:35Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Simultaneous Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: April 27, 2014
13:56The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism
Published on: November 19, 2014