Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Not Just a Linear Closure: Aesthetic Flat Closure after Mastectomy
Kerry A Morrison1, Nolan S Karp1
1Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, N.Y.
This article discusses a new approach for plastic surgeons to achieve a flat chest reconstruction after mastectomy. The authors emphasize the importance of understanding patient preferences and using precise surgical techniques. Key steps include ensuring symmetry, de-fatting the chest wall, and avoiding dog ears. The article suggests that flat closures require more than just linear incisions and demand specific surgical strategies. Surgeons are advised to sit the patient upright to confirm the final outcome. The goal is to meet patient expectations for a natural, flat chest contour.
Area of Science:
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Breast Cancer Reconstruction
- Aesthetic Surgery Techniques
Background:
Flat chest reconstructions after mastectomy are gaining popularity among patients seeking non-protruding outcomes. Prior research has established that mastectomy patients often desire a natural, flat contour to their chest wall. However, no prior literature has specifically outlined surgical techniques for achieving an aesthetic flat closure. This gap motivated the exploration of surgical strategies to meet patient expectations. It was already known that patient communication is essential in reconstructive surgery. Yet, no prior work had resolved how to translate patient preferences into surgical execution for flat closures. The absence of technical guidelines for flat closures left surgeons without clear protocols. This uncertainty drove the need to document key considerations and surgical pearls for this specific aesthetic goal. The demand for flat closures is increasing, but the technical approach remains underexplored. This paper aims to address the lack of guidance for surgeons in this emerging field.
Purpose Of The Study:
This study aims to provide a structured approach for plastic surgeons to achieve aesthetic flat closure after mastectomy. The specific problem is the lack of documented surgical techniques for this procedure. The motivation stems from the growing patient interest in flat chest reconstructions. The authors propose that patient communication and precise surgical execution are central to success. The goal is to delineate key considerations and technical steps for this reconstructive approach. Surgeons need clear guidance on how to translate patient preferences into surgical outcomes. The study focuses on how to achieve symmetry, contour, and absence of dog ears. The authors emphasize that flat closures are not simply linear closures but require specific techniques.
Main Methods:
The authors outline a patient-centered approach, emphasizing the importance of listening to patient concerns and aesthetic goals. They propose a surgical strategy that includes obliterating the inframammary fold and ensuring bilateral symmetry in flap size and thickness. The method involves de-fatting the medial chest wall to create a smooth contour. Precise tissue excision is highlighted to avoid dog ears medially and laterally. Incision symmetry is confirmed bilaterally during surgery. The technique includes intraoperative assessment of soft tissue re-draping. Surgeons are advised to sit the patient upright to evaluate the reconstruction. The method also includes verifying the absence of excess tissue that could compromise flatness.
Main Results:
The key findings suggest that patient communication is a crucial step in achieving aesthetic flat closure. The study proposes that bilateral symmetry in flap thickness and size is essential for a flat outcome. De-fatting the medial chest wall helps achieve a smooth contour. Precise tissue excision prevents dog ears. Intraoperative assessment of soft tissue re-draping is recommended. Sitting the patient upright allows surgeons to confirm flatness and symmetry. The study highlights that flat closures require more than linear incisions. The authors suggest that modified surgical techniques are necessary to meet patient expectations.
Conclusions:
The authors conclude that aesthetic flat closure after mastectomy requires a patient-centered and technically precise approach. They propose that communication with patients is a necessary step in the process. The study suggests that bilateral symmetry and flap thickness are important for flat outcomes. De-fatting and tissue excision are recommended to avoid dog ears. Intraoperative re-draping and upright patient positioning are advised to confirm flatness. The authors state that flat closures are not simply linear closures but require specific techniques. They propose that plastic surgeons should adopt modified surgical strategies to meet patient desires. The study emphasizes that these reconstructions require attention to detail and patient preferences.
Frequently Asked Questions
The core mechanism involves precise tissue excision and de-fatting to ensure bilateral symmetry and avoid dog ears.
Bilateral symmetry in flap thickness and size is necessary to achieve a flat, aesthetically pleasing chest contour.
Sitting the patient upright allows surgeons to assess soft tissue re-draping and confirm flatness and symmetry.
De-fatting the medial chest wall helps create a smooth contour and prevents excess tissue from compromising flatness.
Obliterating the inframammary fold is crucial to achieve a flat chest contour and avoid protrusion.
The authors propose that flat closures require more than linear incisions and demand precise surgical execution.

