Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.9K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring the relationship between food insecurity, exercise addiction, and muscularity-oriented eating behavior: a moderated mediation analysis of muscle dysmorphia and resilience.

Journal of eating disorders·2026
Same author

Events at predicted location expand in time.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Mind-Wandering Enhances Learning under Uncertainty: Insights from Iowa Gambling Task.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same author

The Effect of Spontaneous and Deliberate Mind Wandering on Decision-Making Styles.

The Journal of psychology·2026
Same author

A Modified Mirror Test as a Visual Guide for the Self-awareness Trait in Wild Antarctica Penguins, Pygoscelis adeliae.

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE·2025
Same author

The impact of polycystic ovary syndrome on attention: an empirical investigation.

BioPsychoSocial medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 21, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

812

Self-other differences in intertemporal decision making: An eye-tracking investigation.

Sathya Narayana Sharma1, Azizuddin Khan2

  • 1Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India; Psychophysiology Laboratory, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.

Consciousness and Cognition
|May 31, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Decisions for others are less impulsive than for oneself, influenced by empathy and power. Higher power directs attention to rewards, reducing delay discounting in decisions for others.

Keywords:
EmpathyEye-trackingIntertemporal choicePowerSurrogate decision making

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.4K
Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

604

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 21, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

812
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.4K
Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

604

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroeconomics
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Intertemporal choices involve decisions with immediate and delayed outcomes.
  • Understanding differences in choices for self versus others is crucial for social decision-making.
  • Factors like empathy, construal level, and power may influence these choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how intertemporal choices differ when made for oneself versus for an acquaintance.
  • To examine the role of attention to choice attributes in these differences.
  • To explore the moderating effects of empathy, construal level, and sense of power.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-five participants completed a money choice task for themselves and an acquaintance.
  • Eye movements were tracked during decision-making to measure attention.
  • Trait empathy, construal level, and sense of power were assessed.

Main Results:

  • Lower fantasy empathy predicted decreased delay discounting for others.
  • Higher empathic concern and higher sense of power led to less impulsive choices for both self and others.
  • Increased power biased attention towards rewards when deciding for others, reducing delay discounting.

Conclusions:

  • Empathy and power significantly moderate intertemporal choices, particularly for others.
  • Attention to reward attributes plays a key role in reducing impulsivity when making decisions for others, especially with higher power.
  • Findings align with construal-level theory, suggesting different levels of abstraction influence self-other decision-making.