Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025
Author Spotlight: Minimally Invasive Ultrasound-Guided Acupotomy in Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment
Published on: April 26, 2024
Ultrasound-guided monopolar versus bipolar radiofrequency ablation for genicular nerves in chronic knee
Elsayed M Elemam1, Ola T Abdel Dayem1, Sherif A Mousa1
1Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Background:
This study compared between monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the genicular nerves using ultrasound guidance (USG) in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain.
Material And Methods:
This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Fifty patients with knee osteoarthritis pain were equally randomized to either monopolar or bipolar groups. The primary outcome was visual analogue score (VAS). The secondary outcomes were the proportion of successful responders with a reduction of 50% of VAS score at 12 and 24 weeks, the procedure time and pain and oxford knee score (OKS).VAS and OKS were recorded at 1, 4, 12, 24 weeks after intervention. Any complications were reported.
Results:
Mean VAS score in bipolar group was (p < 0.05) lower than monopolar group at 12 weeks [4.84 ± 0.62 Vs. 3.56 ± 0.71] and 24 weeks [5.44 ± 0.82 Vs. 3.96 ± 0.79]. The Proportion of successful responders with a reduction of at least 50% of VAS score were more in bipolar group than monopolar group at 12 weeks (80% Vs. 12%) and 24 weeks (44% Vs. 4%). Mean OKS score in bipolar group was (p < 0.05) lower than monopolar group at 12 weeks [26 ± 3 Vs. 34 ± 3] and 24 weeks [27 ± 3 Vs. 35 ± 3].The procedure time and pain were (p < 0.05) lower in monopolar than bipolar group. The complications were similar in both groups.
Conclusion:
USG bipolar RF ablation is more effective than monopolar RF ablation in controlling knee osteoarthritis pain as for the duration and severity of pain without fluoroscopic confirmation.
