Climate and nature emergency: From scientists' warnings to sufficient action

Area of Science:

• Environmental Science
• Climate Science
• Ecology

Background:

• Recent scientific warnings highlight a climate and ecological emergency.
• These warnings have faced criticism for lacking accessibility to non-scientists.
• The communication gap exists between primary research and public concerns, especially for vulnerable populations.

Purpose of the Study:

• To review criticisms regarding the inaccessibility of scientific warnings on climate and ecological emergencies.
• To propose strategies for more effective communication of scientific findings to a broader audience.
• To explore different communication registers for engaging various societal groups.

Main Methods:

• Literature review of criticisms concerning scientific communication on environmental emergencies.
• Analysis of communication barriers between scientific experts and the general public.
• Categorization of discourse registers related to ecological issues.

Main Results:

• Criticisms highlight the need for more accessible scientific communication.
• Effective communication requires tailoring messages to different audiences, including the public, policymakers, and business leaders.
• Four distinct communication registers are identified: primary research, specialist-to-non-specialist dissemination, public affairs discussion, and engagement with marginalized groups.

Conclusions:

• Scientists should prioritize accurate and intelligible communication of their findings.
• A broad range of stakeholders, including intellectuals, journalists, and policymakers, can contribute to public engagement.
• Bridging the communication gap is crucial for fostering a global movement towards practical environmental action.