Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
Published on: February 3, 2023
On what it means to automatize a rule
Paul Kovacs1, F Gregory Ashby1
1University of California, Santa Barbara, United States of America.
Abstract:
The results of two experiments are reported that included a combined total of approximately 633,000 categorization trials. The experiments investigated the nature of what is automatized after lengthy practice with a rule-guided behavior. The results of both experiments suggest that an abstract rule, if interpreted as a verbal-based strategy, was not automatized during training, but rather the automatization linked a set of stimuli with similar values on one visual dimension to a common motor response. The experiments were designed to test and refine a recent neurocomputational model of how rule-guided behaviors become automatic (Kovacs, Hélie, Tran, & Ashby, 2021). The model assumes that rule-guided behaviors are initially controlled by a distributed neural network centered on rule units in prefrontal cortex, and that in addition to initiating behavior, this network also trains a faster and more direct network that includes projections from visual cortex directly to the rule-sensitive neurons in premotor cortex. The present results support this model and suggest that the projections from visual cortex to prefrontal and premotor cortex are restricted to visual representations of the relevant stimulus dimension only.
Related Concept Videos
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Mason's Rule
Loop gain is determined by identifying and tracing a path from a node back to itself. This involves computing the product of branch gains along the loop. Each loop's gain is crucial for...
Distribution Reliability and Automation
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
Fixed Action Patterns
Schemas

