Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

A High-Fidelity Porcine Model of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation Following Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: June 6, 2025
Good post-transplant outcomes using liver donors after circulatory death when applying strict selection criteria: A
Margarita Fernández-de la Varga1, Pablo Del Pozo-Del Valle1, Sergio Béjar-Serrano1
1Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Insights
Liver transplantation using donors after circulatory death (DCD) offers similar patient and graft survival rates compared to donors after brain death (DBD). The normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) technique enhances DCD donor suitability for liver transplants.
Area of Science:
- Transplantation immunology
- Organ transplantation
- Surgical outcomes
Background:
- Liver transplantation (LT) outcomes with donors after circulatory death (DCD) have historically been suboptimal, particularly concerning ischemic cholangiopathy when using the super-rapid recovery (SRR) technique.
- This perception necessitates a comparative analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DCD donors versus donors after brain death (DBD) in a high-volume liver transplant center.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of complications in liver transplant recipients who received grafts from DCD donors versus DBD donors.
- To assess the impact of different DCD recovery techniques (SRR and normothermic regional perfusion [NRP]) on transplant outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study was conducted, comparing 51 LT recipients with DCD donors to 51 matched LT recipients with DBD donors.
- Propensity score matching was employed, considering LT indication, recipient/donor age and sex, and MELD score.
- Data were collected for LT procedures performed between January 2015 and December 2018.
Main Results:
- Biliary complications were more frequent in the DCD group (10%) compared to the DBD group (2%), primarily associated with the SRR technique.
- Primary graft non-function occurred in 4% of DCD recipients versus 0% of DBD recipients.
- Postoperative bleeding and reintervention rates were higher in the DCD group (13.7% vs 1.95% and 15.7% vs 3.9%, respectively).
- Peak AST/ALT levels on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher in the DCD group (p≤0.0001).
- Rejection, vascular complications, renal injury, hospital stay, and readmission rates were similar between groups.
- Cumulative 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year graft and patient survival rates were comparable for both DCD and DBD liver transplantation.
Conclusions:
- Donors after circulatory death (DCD) represent a viable option to expand the donor pool for liver transplantation.
- The normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) technique appears to mitigate some risks associated with DCD liver transplantation, leading to outcomes comparable to those of donors after brain death (DBD).
- DCD donors, particularly when utilizing the NRP technique, can achieve similar graft and patient survival rates to DBD donors, making them an adequate choice for increasing donor availability.
Introduction And Objectives:
Outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) with donors after circulatory death (DCD) have been considered suboptimal due to higher rates of ischemic cholangiopathy, especially when the super-rapid recovery (SRR) technique is used. This study aimed to compare the incidence of complications between recipients receiving DCD vs those receiving donors after brain death (DBD) in a large-volume liver transplant centre.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective cohort study (LT from January 2015 to December 2018) comparing recipients who underwent a LT with DCD vs. a control group of LT with DBD, matched 1:1 without replacement by propensity score matching that included the following variables: LT indication, recipient sex and age, donor age and MELD score.
Results:
51 recipients with DCD-LT (29 SRR, 22 normothermic regional perfusion [NRP]) were matched with 51 DBD-LT recipients. Biliary complications were more frequent in DCD, 10% (n=5), all with SRR technique, vs 2% (n=1) in the DBD group, p=0.2. Two patients (4%) suffered primary graft non-function in the DCD group (1 SRR and 1 NRP) versus zero in the DBD group (p=0.49). Postoperative bleeding and reinterventions were also higher in the DCD group: 7 (13.7%) vs 1 (1.95%) and 8 (15.7%) vs 2 (3.9%) respectively (p=0.06 and 0.09). On the 1st postoperative day AST/ALT peak was higher in DCD (p≤0001). The incidence of rejection, vascular complications, renal injury, hospital stay, and readmissions were similar in both groups. Cumulative 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year graft and patient survival were also similar.
Conclusions:
DCD donors are an adequate option to increase the donor pool in LT, achieving similar graft and patient survival rates to those achieved with DBD donors, especially when the NRP technique is used.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure

