Good post-transplant outcomes using liver donors after circulatory death when applying strict selection criteria: A

Margarita Fernández-de la Varga1, Pablo Del Pozo-Del Valle1, Sergio Béjar-Serrano1

  • 1Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

Insights

Liver transplantation using donors after circulatory death (DCD) offers similar patient and graft survival rates compared to donors after brain death (DBD). The normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) technique enhances DCD donor suitability for liver transplants.

Area of Science:

  • Transplantation immunology
  • Organ transplantation
  • Surgical outcomes

Background:

  • Liver transplantation (LT) outcomes with donors after circulatory death (DCD) have historically been suboptimal, particularly concerning ischemic cholangiopathy when using the super-rapid recovery (SRR) technique.
  • This perception necessitates a comparative analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DCD donors versus donors after brain death (DBD) in a high-volume liver transplant center.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the incidence of complications in liver transplant recipients who received grafts from DCD donors versus DBD donors.
  • To assess the impact of different DCD recovery techniques (SRR and normothermic regional perfusion [NRP]) on transplant outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective cohort study was conducted, comparing 51 LT recipients with DCD donors to 51 matched LT recipients with DBD donors.
  • Propensity score matching was employed, considering LT indication, recipient/donor age and sex, and MELD score.
  • Data were collected for LT procedures performed between January 2015 and December 2018.

Main Results:

  • Biliary complications were more frequent in the DCD group (10%) compared to the DBD group (2%), primarily associated with the SRR technique.
  • Primary graft non-function occurred in 4% of DCD recipients versus 0% of DBD recipients.
  • Postoperative bleeding and reintervention rates were higher in the DCD group (13.7% vs 1.95% and 15.7% vs 3.9%, respectively).
  • Peak AST/ALT levels on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher in the DCD group (p≤0.0001).
  • Rejection, vascular complications, renal injury, hospital stay, and readmission rates were similar between groups.
  • Cumulative 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year graft and patient survival rates were comparable for both DCD and DBD liver transplantation.

Conclusions:

  • Donors after circulatory death (DCD) represent a viable option to expand the donor pool for liver transplantation.
  • The normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) technique appears to mitigate some risks associated with DCD liver transplantation, leading to outcomes comparable to those of donors after brain death (DBD).
  • DCD donors, particularly when utilizing the NRP technique, can achieve similar graft and patient survival rates to DBD donors, making them an adequate choice for increasing donor availability.
Abstract