Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
Published on: October 10, 2019
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Predict Ki67 Discordance Between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Samples
Wenjuan Wei1, Yinan Ji2, Zhi Tang1
1Department of Radiology, Liuzhou People's Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Background:
Disagreement in assessments of Ki67 expression based on core-needle biopsy and matched surgical samples complicates decisions in the treatment of breast cancer.
Purpose:
To examine whether preoperative breast MRI could be useful in predicting Ki67 discordance between core-needle biopsy and surgical samples.
Study Type:
Retrospective.
Population:
Three hundred and sixty-five breast cancer patients with MRI scans and having both core-needle biopsy and surgical samples from 2017 to 2019.
Field Strength/Sequence:
3.0 T, T2-weighted iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation sequence, diffusion-weighted sequence using b-values 0/1000, dynamic contrast enhanced image by volume imaged breast assessme NT.
Assessment:
We collected clinicopathologic variables and preoperative MRI features (tumor size, lesion type, shape of mass, spiculated margin, internal enhancement, peri-tumoral edema, intra-tumoral necrosis, multifocal/multicentric, apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] minimum, ADC mean, ADC maximum, ADC difference).
Statistical Tests:
K-means clustering, multivariable logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curve.
Results:
Sixty-one patients showed Ki67 discordance and 304 patients show Ki67 concordance according to our definition using K-means clustering. Multivariable regression analysis showed that the following parameters were independently associated with Ki67 discordance: peri-tumoral edema, odds ratio (OR) 2.662, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.432-4.948; ADCmin ≤ 0.829 × 10-3 mm2 /sec, OR 2.180, 95% CI 1.075-4.418; and ADCdiff > 0.317 × 10-3 mm2 /sec, OR 3.365, 95% CI 1.698-6.669. This multivariable model resulted in an AUC of 0.758 (95% CI 0.711-0.802) with sensitivity and specificity being 0.803 and 0.621, respectively.
Conclusion:
Presence of peri-tumoral edema, smaller ADCmin and greater ADCdiff in preoperative breast MRI may indicate high risk of Ki67 discordance between core-needle biopsy and surgical samples. For patients with these MRI-based risk factors, clinicians should not rely on Ki67 assessment only from core-needle biopsy.

