Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025
Use of a Rat Model to Study Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair
Published on: October 2, 2017
Inguinal Hernia Repairs on the Chief's Service: A Safe Educational Model in Resident Entrustment
Maggie E Bosley1, Hope E Werenski1, Myron S Powell1
1Department of Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Objective:
We hypothesized that a Chief Resident Service educational model provides safe care for patients compared to that received on standard academic services where rotating residents adopt the practices and preferences of their attending.
Design:
We retrospectively identified patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs from July 2016 through June 2019 and matched Chief's service patients to standard academic service patients 1:1 on CPT, sex and age. We compared patient characteristics, recurrence rates, outcomes and complications.
Setting:
Tertiary care center, single institution.
Participants:
Overall, 77 patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs (66% open and 34% laparoscopic) on the Chief's service matched successfully to 77 standard academic service patients during the study period.
Results:
Age, BMI and ASA were similar between the services, but Chief's service patients were less likely to be current smokers (1.3% vs. 24.7%) and more likely to be former smokers (59.7% vs. 26.0%) than standard academic service patients (p < 0.01). Patients presenting with incarcerated hernias (5.2% vs. 9.1%), recurrent (10.4% vs. 5.2%) and bilateral hernias (19.5% vs. 10.4%) were similar between the Chief's service and standard academic services, respectively (all p > 0.05). Operative times were longer for the Chief's service for open (123 min vs. 67, p < 0.01) and laparoscopic (112 min vs. 79, p = 0.02) repairs. Recurrence rates (6.5% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.47) and complications including infection, seroma or hematoma requiring evacuation and need for reoperation were similarly low (p > 0.05) between the Chief's and standard academic services, respectively. Despite low complication rates, Chief's service patients were more likely to present to the ED post-op (14.3% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.001), but readmission rates were similarly low (2.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.09).
Conclusions:
Providing general surgery chief residents with a supervised opportunity to direct, plan and provide surgical care in clinic and the operating room, as a transition to independent practice following graduation, is safe for patients presenting with inguinal hernias. Concerns about patient safety should not be a barrier to maximizing entrustment for the evaluation and operative management of select core general surgery diagnoses and operations.
