Support Vector Machine versus Multiple Logistic Regression for Prediction of Postherpetic Neuralgia in Outpatients
Jie Zhang1, Qiao Ding2, Xiu-Liang Li1
1Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Background:
Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), as the most common complication of herpes zoster (HZ), is very refractory to current therapies. Studies of HZ have indicated that early aggressive pain interventions can effectively prevent PHN; therefore, accurately predicting PHN in outpatients with HZ and treating HZ promptly, would be of great benefit to patients. Multiple logistic regression (MLR) has often been used to predict PHN. However, support vector machine (SVM) has been poorly studied in predicting PHN in outpatients with HZ.
Objective:
The aim of our retrospective study was to analyze the data of outpatients with HZ to evaluate the use of SVM for predicting PHN by comparing it with MLR.
Study Design:
A retrospective study.
Setting:
Department of Anesthesiology in China.
Methods:
The data of 732 outpatients with HZ from January 1, 2015 to May 31, 2020 were reviewed. Risk factors for having PHN in outpatients with HZ were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. Then, SVM and MLR were used to predict PHN in outpatients with HZ based on screened risk factors. The data from 600 patients were used for training set and another 132 patients for test set. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn from the 132 test set of patients. The prediction accuracy of the models was assessed using the area under curve (AUC).
Results:
The incidence of having PHN in outpatients with HZ was 19.4%. The risk factors selected by LASSO algorithm were gender, age, VAS scores, skin lesion area, initial treatment time, anxiety, sites of HZ (multiple skin lesions), types of HZ (bullous) and types of pain (knife cutting). The AUC for the SVM and MLR in test set were 0.884 versus 0.853. According to the ROC curve, the specificity and the sensitivity were 0.879 and 0.840 for SVM, and 0.780 and 0.840 for MLR, respectively.
Limitations:
Retrospective study and relatively small sample size.
Conclusions:
Both SVM and MLR had good discriminative power, but SVM has better performance in predicting PHN in outpatients with HZ, regarding the prediction accuracy and specificity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...


