Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Many researchers were not compliant with their published data sharing statement: a mixed-methods study.
Mirko Gabelica1, Ružica Bojčić2, Livia Puljak3
1Department for otorhinolaryngology, with head and neck surgery, University Hospital Centre Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000, Split, Croatia.
Researchers often do not share data even when stating they will in data availability statements (DAS). This suggests mandatory DAS alone may not ensure data sharing for open-access publications.
Area of Science:
- Bibliometrics
- Scholarly Communication
- Open Science
Background:
- Open-access publishing mandates data availability statements (DAS).
- Ensuring researchers comply with DAS is crucial for scientific transparency and reproducibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess researcher compliance with data availability statements.
- To determine the effectiveness of mandatory DAS in facilitating data sharing.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 3556 articles from 333 open-access journals published in January 2019.
- Categorization of DAS types and survey of corresponding authors.
- Attempted reanalysis of shared data sets.
Main Results:
- 3416 out of 3556 articles contained a DAS.
- 42% of DAS indicated data availability upon reasonable request.
- 93% of authors who stated data would be shared did not respond or declined; only 6.8% provided data.
Conclusions:
- Researcher compliance with data availability statements is low.
- Mandatory DAS may not be sufficient to guarantee actual data sharing.
- Further strategies are needed to improve data sharing practices in open-access research.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Data Collection by Survey

