Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Using Chicken Embryo as a Powerful Tool in Assessment of Developmental Cardiotoxicities
Published on: March 21, 2021
Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals for DNA Damage in the Chicken Egg Genotoxicity Assay (CEGA)
Tetyana Kobets1, Jian-Dong Duan1, Esther Vock2
1Department of Pathology, Immunology and Microbiology, 8137New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Abstract:
DNA damage is an established initiating event in the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of genotoxic chemicals. Accordingly, assessment of this endpoint is critical for chemicals which are being developed for use in humans. To assess the ability of the Chicken Egg Genotoxicity Assay (CEGA) to detect genotoxic pharmaceuticals, a set of 23 compounds with different pharmacological and reported genotoxic effects was tested for the potential to produce nuclear DNA adducts and strand breaks in the embryo-fetal livers using the 32P-nucleotide postlabeling (NPL) and comet assays, respectively. Due to high toxicity, two aneugens, colchicine and vinblastine, and an autophagy inhibitor, hydroxychloroquine, could not be evaluated. Out of the 20 remaining pharmaceuticals, 10 including estrogen modulators, diethylstilbestrol and tamoxifen, antineoplastics cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and mitomycin C, antifungal griseofulvin, local anesthetics lidocaine and prilocaine, and antihistamines diphenhydramine and doxylamine, yielded clear positive outcomes in at least one of the assays. The antihypertensive vasodilator hydralazine and antineoplastics streptozotocin and teniposide, produced only DNA strand breaks, which were not dose-dependent, and thus, the results with these 3 pharmaceuticals were considered equivocal. No DNA damage was detected for 7 compounds, including the purine antagonist 6-thioguanine, antipyretic analgesics acetaminophen and phenacetin, antibiotic ciprofloxacin, antilipidemic clofibrate, anti-inflammatory ibuprofen, and sedative phenobarbital. However, low solubility of these compounds limited dosages tested in CEGA. Overall, results in CEGA were largely in concordance with the outcomes in other systems in vitro and in vivo, indicating that CEGA provides reliable detection of DNA damaging activity of genotoxic compounds. Further evaluations with a broader set of compounds would support this conclusion.
Insights
The Chicken Egg Genotoxicity Assay (CEGA) effectively detects DNA damage from genotoxic pharmaceuticals. CEGA results align with other tests, confirming its reliability for assessing chemical safety in human development.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology and Pharmacology
- Genotoxicity Testing
- Developmental Toxicology
Background:
- DNA damage is a key factor in chemical mutagenicity and carcinogenicity.
- Assessing DNA damage is crucial for evaluating chemicals intended for human use.
- The Chicken Egg Genotoxicity Assay (CEGA) is a potential tool for this assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the Chicken Egg Genotoxicity Assay's (CEGA) capability in detecting genotoxic pharmaceuticals.
- To assess the potential of 23 compounds to induce DNA adducts and strand breaks in embryo-fetal livers.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the 32P-nucleotide postlabeling (NPL) assay for DNA adducts.
- Employed the comet assay for detecting DNA strand breaks.
- Tested 20 pharmaceuticals in embryo-fetal chicken livers (colchicine, vinblastine, hydroxychloroquine excluded due to toxicity).
Main Results:
- Ten out of 20 tested pharmaceuticals showed clear positive results for DNA damage in at least one assay.
- Three compounds (hydralazine, streptozotocin, teniposide) yielded equivocal results (non-dose-dependent DNA strand breaks).
- Seven compounds showed no detectable DNA damage, though low solubility limited tested dosages for some.
Conclusions:
- The CEGA demonstrated reliable detection of DNA damaging activity in pharmaceuticals.
- CEGA findings were largely consistent with results from other in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity systems.
- Further studies with a wider range of compounds are recommended to solidify CEGA's validation.

