Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Variation01:19

Variation

7.2K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
7.2K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

192
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
192
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K
Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square01:18

Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square

3.1K
Consider a curve representing sample data drawn randomly from a normally distributed population. One must construct confidence intervals to estimate or to test a claim regarding the population standard deviation. For example, a 95% confidence interval covers 95% of the area under the curve, and the remaining 5% is equally distributed on either side of the curve. To achieve such confidence intervals, one must determine the critical values. The critical values are simply the values separating the...
3.1K
Coefficient of Variation01:10

Coefficient of Variation

4.7K
The coefficient of variation measures the dispersion of the data points or distribution around the mean. Using the coefficient of variation, we can compare two data series with drastically different means or different units of measurement. The coefficient of variation for a sample and a population is expressed as a percentage of the ratio of standard deviation to the mean.
The coefficient of variation is a practical statistical tool in finance. It allows investors to assess the volatility or...
4.7K
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation01:09

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

5.5K
The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
5.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of data-driven motion correction for respiratory movement on lesion detectability in PET-CT: a phantom study.

EJNMMI physics·2025
Same author

Validation of quantitative salivary gland scintigraphy in relation to the American-European concensus criteria for Sjögren's syndrome.

Nuclear medicine communications·2019
Same author

A method to measure the absorbed dose of the thyroid during I-131 therapy, using a collar detector system and a SPECT acquisition.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

Measuring the actual I-131 thyroid uptake curve with a collar detector system: a feasibility study.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2016
Same author

Variations in 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) late heart mediastinal ratios in chronic heart failure: a need for standardisation and validation.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2007
Same author

No-carrier-added versus carrier-added123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine for the assessment of cardiac sympathetic nerve activity.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2006

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.6K

Method to determine the statistical technical variability of SUV metrics.

Giulia M R De Luca1, Jan B A Habraken2

  • 1Department of Medical Physics, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. g.deluca@antoniusziekenhuis.nl.

EJNMMI Physics
|June 6, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a method to measure statistical technical variation in Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) metrics from PET images. The findings show variation depends on SUV metric choice and lesion size, crucial for interpreting diagnostic changes.

Keywords:
PET quantificationStandard uptake valueVariation in standard uptake value

More Related Videos

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.6K
Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe
09:34

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe

Published on: December 4, 2016

28.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.6K
Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.6K
Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe
09:34

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe

Published on: December 4, 2016

28.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Radiochemistry

Background:

  • Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) metrics (Max, Mean, Peak) quantify PET images.
  • Understanding SUV variation (biological and technical) is vital for diagnostic interpretation.
  • A method to determine statistical technical variation of SUV in PET images is presented.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a method for assessing statistical technical variation in SUV metrics.
  • To evaluate how SUV metric choice and lesion size influence technical variation.
  • To inform the interpretation of SUV changes in clinical studies.

Main Methods:

  • Acquisition data (150s) was divided into statistically independent subsets.
  • SUVMax, SUVMean, and SUVPeak were calculated for each reconstructed subset image.
  • Coefficient of variation within subsets estimated expected variation at 150s acquisition length.

Main Results:

  • The largest coefficient of variation was observed for the smallest sphere.
  • The smallest coefficient of variation was observed for the largest sphere.
  • Expected variation at 150s was under 6% for the smallest sphere and under 2% for the largest sphere.

Conclusions:

  • The presented method quantifies statistical technical variation of SUV metrics.
  • The method allows evaluation of SUV metric choice and lesion size impact on technical variation.
  • This aids in assessing the relevance of technical variation to total SUV variability in clinical studies.