Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Shadow mentoring: a cost-benefit review for reform
Brionna Davis-Reyes1, Chrystal Starbird2, Aileen I Fernandez3
1Yale University, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT, USA.
Shadow mentoring, relationships outside formal roles, are vital for retaining scientific trainees but often overlooked. This paper explores its benefits and proposes ways to recognize this crucial support system.
Area of Science:
- Scientific training and development
- Mentorship in research environments
Background:
- Traditional mentoring is well-established in scientific training.
- Informal 'shadow mentoring' relationships are prevalent but unacknowledged.
- Lack of recognition impacts trainee retention and community contribution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define and explore shadow mentoring relationships.
- To analyze the costs and benefits of shadow mentoring.
- To propose mechanisms for acknowledging shadow mentoring's value.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative analysis of informal mentoring dynamics.
- Literature review on mentorship and trainee retention.
- Framework development for recognizing shadow mentoring.
Main Results:
- Shadow mentoring significantly enhances trainee experience and skill development.
- Benefits include broader network access and diverse perspectives.
- Costs involve potential for unguided or misinformed advice if not properly contextualized.
Conclusions:
- Shadow mentoring is a critical, yet undervalued, component of scientific training.
- Formal acknowledgment is necessary to support trainee retention.
- Implementing recognition mechanisms will strengthen scientific communities.
Related Concept Videos
Halo Effect
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting

