Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates
Published on: September 5, 2017
Fully Automatic Quantitative Measurement of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Thymic Epithelial Tumors Using a Convolutional Neural
Sangwon Han1, Jungsu S Oh1, Yong-Il Kim1
1From the Departments of Nuclear Medicine.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning (DL)-based segmentation algorithm for automatic measurement of metabolic parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT in thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), comparable performance to manual volumes of interest.
Patients And Methods:
A total of 186 consecutive patients with resectable TETs and preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively enrolled (145 thymomas, 41 thymic carcinomas). A quasi-3D U-net architecture was trained to resemble ground-truth volumes of interest. Segmentation performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient. Agreements between manual and DL-based automated extraction of SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and 63 radiomics features were evaluated via concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and linear regression slopes. Diagnostic and prognostic values were compared in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for thymic carcinoma and hazards ratios (HRs) for freedom from recurrence.
Results:
The mean Dice similarity coefficient was 0.83 ± 0.34. Automatically measured SUVmax (slope, 0.97; CCC, 0.92), MTV (slope, 0.94; CCC, 0.96), and TLG (slope, 0.96; CCC, 0.96) were in good agreement with manual measurements. The mean CCC and slopes were 0.88 ± 0.06 and 0.89 ± 0.05, respectively, for the radiomics parameters. Automatically measured SUVmax, MTV, and TLG showed good diagnostic accuracy for thymic carcinoma (AUCs: SUVmax, 0.95; MTV, 0.85; TLG, 0.87) and significant prognostic value (HRs: SUVmax, 1.31 [95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.48]; MTV, 2.11 [1.09-4.06]; TLG, 1.90 [1.12-3.23]). No significant differences in the AUCs or HRs were found between automatic and manual measurements for any of the metabolic parameters.
Conclusions:
Our DL-based model provides comparable segmentation performance and metabolic parameter values to manual measurements in TETs.
More Related Videos
07:54Implantation and Monitoring by PET/CT of an Orthotopic Model of Human Pleural Mesothelioma in Athymic Mice
Published on: December 21, 2019
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018