Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Atomic Orbitals02:44

Atomic Orbitals

36.5K
An atomic orbital represents the three-dimensional regions in an atom where an electron has the highest probability to reside. The radial distribution function indicates the total probability of finding an electron within the thin shell at a distance r from the nucleus. The atomic orbitals have distinct shapes which are determined by l, the angular momentum quantum number. The orbitals are often drawn with a boundary surface, enclosing densest regions of the cloud.
36.5K
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I03:24

Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I

49.3K
The mathematical expression known as the wave function, ψ, contains information about each orbital and the wavelike properties of electrons in an isolated atom. When atoms are bound together in a molecule, the wave functions combine to produce new mathematical descriptions that have different shapes. This process of combining the wave functions for atomic orbitals is called hybridization and is mathematically accomplished by the linear combination of atomic orbitals. The new orbitals that...
49.3K
Atomic Structure01:33

Atomic Structure

200.5K
Overview
200.5K
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II03:35

Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II

34.0K
sp3d and sp3d 2 Hybridization
34.0K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution01:14

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution

1.2K
Near absolute zero temperatures, in the presence of a magnetic field, the majority of nuclei prefer the lower energy spin-up state to the higher energy spin-down state. As temperatures increase, the energy from thermal collisions distributes the spins more equally between the two states. The Boltzmann distribution equation gives the ratio of the number of spins predicted in the spin −½ (N−) and spin +½ (N+) states.
1.2K
The Energies of Atomic Orbitals03:21

The Energies of Atomic Orbitals

25.5K
In an atom, the negatively charged electrons are attracted to the positively charged nucleus. In a multielectron atom, electron-electron repulsions are also observed. The attractive and repulsive forces are dependent on the distance between the particles, as well as the sign and magnitude of the charges on the individual particles. When the charges on the particles are opposite, they attract each other. If both particles have the same charge, they repel each other.
25.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reducing normalized mean square error during channel estimation using minimum pilot symbols in massive MIMO network.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

When intubation fails: Unmasking a rare airway emergency in neonatal intensive care unit.

Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine·2026
Same author

Halogen and Halomethyl Substitution Effects in Anthracene-Based Extreme Ultraviolet Resist Models: A Theoretical Study of Dissociation Mechanisms and Optoelectronic Properties.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same author

7-days versus 14-days antibiotic therapy in uncomplicated culture proven neonatal sepsis: a randomized control assessor-blinded trial.

European journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

Nanoconfined superionic water is a molecular superionic.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Influence of the Size and Shape of Palladium Nanoparticles on Their Electrochemical Hydrogen Sorption Capacity.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

Interplay of Anisotropy, Dzyaloshinskii Moriya Interaction and Symmetry breaking Fields in a 2D XY Ferromagnet.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

Single-molecule electron transport near a charge-trapping orbital-level alignment.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

Δ<sub>T</sub>Noise as a Robust Diagnostic for Chiral, Helical and Trivial Edge Modes.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

A Quantum Framework for Negative Magnetoresistance in Multi-Weyl Semimetals.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

Magnetic anisotropy and electronic structure in surface-supported single rare-earth atom magnets: a topical review.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

Modeling thermal transport in AlN/GaN superlattices and heterostructures with machine-learned force fields.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.3K

Fast atomic structure optimization with on-the-fly sparse Gaussian process potentials.

Amir Hajibabaei1, Muhammad Umer1, Rohit Anand1

  • 1Center for Superfunctional Materials, Department of Chemistry, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, 50 UNIST-gil, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.

Journal of Physics. Condensed Matter : an Institute of Physics Journal
|June 8, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning potentials (MLPs) accelerate atomic structure optimization. Sparse Gaussian process regression (SGPR) significantly reduces the need for computationally expensive first-principles calculations in global structure searches.

Keywords:
machine learning potentialssparse Gaussian process potentialsstructure optimization

More Related Videos

Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization
05:37

Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization

Published on: August 22, 2025

98
Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.3K
Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization
05:37

Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization

Published on: August 22, 2025

98
Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Computational materials science
  • Machine learning in chemistry
  • Atomic structure optimization

Background:

  • Accurate atomic structure optimization is crucial for materials discovery.
  • First-principles calculations are computationally intensive, limiting their use in large-scale simulations.
  • Machine learning potentials (MLPs) offer a promising alternative for accelerating these calculations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the efficacy of on-the-fly machine learning potentials (MLPs) using sparse Gaussian process regression (SGPR) for rapid atomic structure optimization.
  • To assess the acceleration achieved compared to traditional first-principles (FP) methods.
  • To evaluate the transferability and suitability of MLPs for global optimization strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of on-the-fly sparse Gaussian process regression (SGPR) for MLPs.
  • Application to local optimization of atomic structures.
  • Testing on random gold clusters to assess force reduction.
  • Sequential optimization using MLPs for global structure searching.

Main Results:

  • Significant acceleration in atomic structure optimization, even for single local optimizations.
  • Forces reduced to approximately 0.1 eV/Å within ten first-principles (FP) calculations for random gold clusters.
  • Demonstrated suitability of highly transferable MLPs for global optimization methods.
  • Reduced reliance on FP calculations during sequential optimization of gold clusters.

Conclusions:

  • On-the-fly MLPs with SGPR provide substantial speedups for atomic structure optimization.
  • MLPs, despite potential accuracy limitations for exact local minima, are highly effective for accelerating global structure searches.
  • This approach significantly reduces computational cost, making large-scale materials exploration more feasible.