Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

04:04
Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness
Published on: July 11, 2025
350
Cranial osteopathic techniques and electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power: a controlled crossover trial
Mattia Cella1, Eric Acella2, Alessandro Aquino2,3,4
1Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Osteopatia, Milan, Italy.
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
|June 8, 2022
Summary
Osteopathic manipulative treatment using the compression of the fourth ventricle (CV4) technique impacts brain activity, unlike the sacral technique (ST). This suggests distinct neurophysiological mechanisms underlying osteopathic cranial field therapies.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine
- Physiology
Background:
- The osteopathic tradition in the cranial field (OCF) posits a primary respiratory mechanism (PRM) linked anatomically between the occiput and sacrum.
- Previous research on the occiput-sacrum connection has yielded inconsistent results, with no studies exploring its neurophysiological basis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neurophysiological connection between the occiput and sacrum.
- To compare the effects of the sacral technique (ST) and compression of the fourth ventricle (CV4) on brain alpha-band power (AABP).
Main Methods:
- Healthy volunteers were randomized into groups receiving active (CV4, ST) or sham (sCV4, sST) techniques.
- Electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded occipital AABP during resting state, intervention, and post-intervention periods.
- Repeated-measure ANOVA analyzed the interaction between time and treatment (CV4/ST).
Main Results:
- A statistically significant time × treatment interaction effect was observed (F=791.4; p<0.001).
- The CV4 technique led to a significant increase in AABP post-application compared to CV4 and sham CV4 (p<0.001).
- No significant differences in AABP were found during or after ST and sST application compared to the resting state.
Conclusions:
- The sacral technique (ST) does not induce immediate changes in occipital AABP.
- The CV4 technique demonstrated immediate effects on AABP, supporting previous findings.
- Alternative biological mechanisms for the head-sacrum connection in OCF therapy warrant further investigation.

