Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Mechanisms of Membrane Domain Formation

Mechanisms of Membrane Domain Formation

Different physical properties of lipids and proteins allow them to localize and form distinct islands or domains in the membrane. Some membrane domains are formed due to protein-protein interactions, whereas others are formed due to the presence of specific lipids such as sphingolipids and sterols—for example, large proteins, such as bacteriorhodopsin, aggregate and create distinct domains.
Another mechanism for membrane domain formation involves membrane proteins interacting with...

Fluid Mosaic Model

Fluid Mosaic Model

Scientists identified the plasma membrane in the 1890s and its principal chemical components (lipids and proteins) by 1915. The model for plasma membrane structure, proposed in 1935 by Hugh Davson and James Danielli, was the first model to be widely accepted in the scientific community. The model was based on the plasma membrane's "railroad track" appearance in early electron micrographs. Davson and Danielli theorized that the plasma membrane's structure resembled a sandwich...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Label Type Influence on DNA Translocation Velocity in Solid-State Nanopores.

ACS nano·2026

Same author

Membrane-Spanning Nanopores Formed from Nucleic Acids.

Chemical reviews·2026

Same author

Modular RNA:DNA Nanostructures Enable Nanopore Profiling of rRNA Processing and rRNA Variants.

ACS nano·2026

Same author

Reconfigurable Multichannel Glass Nanopores Speed up DNA and MicroRNA Detection.

Nano letters·2026

Same author

Quantification of disease-associated RNA tandem repeats by nanopore sensing.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Comparative Benchmarking of Glass and Silicon Nitride Nanopores for Single-Molecule Detection.

ACS nano·2026

Same journal

Topological properties of curved spacetime extended Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026

Same journal

Influence of lattice expansion on Cr ferromagnetism in Ce<sub>(1-x)</sub>La<sub>(x)</sub>CrGe<sub>3</sub>compounds revealed by atomic-scale measurements.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026

Same journal

Bond-length-driven magnetic transition in quasi-one-dimensional CrSb<i>X</i><sub>3</sub>(<i>X</i>=S, Se).

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026

Same journal

Anelasticity in MgAl2O4 spinel due to cation order-disorder.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026

Same journal

The influence of water on the dynamics of alternating polymers P(C<sub>8</sub>EG<sub>4</sub>) and P(C<sub>4</sub>EG<sub>4</sub>) by broadband dielectric spectroscopy.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026

Same journal

How surface curvature shapes water nanodroplets in air.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Membrane Transport Processes Analyzed by a Highly Parallel Nanopore Chip System at Single Protein Resolution

Membrane Transport Processes Analyzed by a Highly Parallel Nanopore Chip System at Single Protein Resolution

Published on: August 16, 2016

Observing capture with a colloidal model membrane channel.

Stuart F Knowles¹, Marcus Fletcher¹, Jeffrey Mc Hugh¹

¹Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, J J Thomson Ave, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom.

Journal of Physics. Condensed Matter : an Institute of Physics Journal

|June 9, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers used video microscopy to observe colloidal particle capture in microfluidic channels. Device geometry influences particle attraction and concentration, impacting transport in biological channels and nanopore sensors.

Keywords:

colloids confined transport phenomena microfluidics

More Related Videos

Single-Molecule Diffusion and Assembly on Polymer-Crowded Lipid Membranes

Single-Molecule Diffusion and Assembly on Polymer-Crowded Lipid Membranes

Published on: July 19, 2022

Cell Capture Using a Microfluidic Device

Cell Capture Using a Microfluidic Device

Published on: October 1, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Membrane Transport Processes Analyzed by a Highly Parallel Nanopore Chip System at Single Protein Resolution

Membrane Transport Processes Analyzed by a Highly Parallel Nanopore Chip System at Single Protein Resolution

Published on: August 16, 2016

Single-Molecule Diffusion and Assembly on Polymer-Crowded Lipid Membranes

Single-Molecule Diffusion and Assembly on Polymer-Crowded Lipid Membranes

Published on: July 19, 2022

Cell Capture Using a Microfluidic Device

Cell Capture Using a Microfluidic Device

Published on: October 1, 2007

Area of Science:

Fluid dynamics
Colloidal science
Microfluidics

Background:

Understanding particle transport is crucial for microfluidic devices.
Particle capture dynamics influence biological channels and nanopore sensors.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the full capture process of colloidal particles in microfluidic channels.
To map spatial velocity and concentration fields during particle transport.
To determine the effect of microfluidic device geometry on particle capture.

Main Methods:

Video microscopy was employed to track colloidal particle trajectories.
Spatial velocity and concentration fields were mapped for various flow velocities.
Microfluidic devices with varying height profiles were utilized.

Main Results:

Velocity fields showed agreement with numerical simulations, indicating minimal particle-induced flow perturbation.
Changing reservoir geometry altered particle capture behavior from long-range attraction to diffusion-like.
Concentration fields varied qualitatively with device geometry.

Conclusions:

Microfluidic device geometry significantly impacts particle capture and concentration.
Results provide insights for microfluidic device design and understanding capture radius.
This study lays a foundation for transport models in biological systems and sensors.