Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Deception Cues During High-Risk Situations: 911 Homicide Calls
Patrick M Markey1, Erika Feeney1, Brooke Berry1
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Villanova University.
Abstract:
During everyday interactions, cues tend to be weakly related to deception. However, there are theoretical reasons to suspect that such cues will be more prominent during high-risk interactions. The current study explored deception cues during one particular high-risk interaction-911 homicide calls placed by adults. In Sample 1, judges coded 911 homicide calls (n = 82) by Q-sorting 86 cues. Results indicated that deceptive callers tended to display emotional cues (e.g., self-dramatizing, moody, worried, emotional, nervous), appeared overwhelmed, and related narratives that lacked structure, clarity, and focus. Judges coded a separate sample of 911 calls (n = 64), and deception scores were computed using a template-matching approach based on the findings from Sample 1. Results indicated that deceptive 911 callers had higher deception scores than honest callers. The effect sizes yielded in this study highlight the relevance of deception cues during high-risk interactions and the usefulness of the person-centered Q-sort method.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Bystander Effect
Deindividuation
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Ethical Dilemmas II

