Clinical impact of ECG changes on oversensing of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Takahiro Hakamata1, Sou Otsuki1, Daisuke Izumi1
1Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Background:
Inappropriate shocks delivered by subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) are most frequently caused by cardiac oversensing. However, the predictors for oversensing of S-ICD remain unclear.
Objective:
We aimed to investigate the predictors for oversensing of S-ICD, especially clinical impact of an electrocardiographic (ECG) change.
Methods:
We retrospectively enrolled 99 consecutive patients who underwent S-ICD implantation between 2013 and 2021. Oversensing events were defined as inappropriate charge of the capacitors induced by cardiac or noncardiac signals other than tachycardia.
Results:
During a median follow-up period of 34 months (interquartile range 20-50 months), 11 of 99 patients (11%) experienced 34 oversensing events and 4 patients (4%) received inappropriate shocks during their events. Six patients exhibited ECG changes (bundle branch block, 3; ventricular pacing, 1; inverted T wave, 1; poor R-wave progression, 1) during the follow-up period. Oversensing events were observed in 4 of 6 patients with ECG change (67%), and 3 patients underwent S-ICD removal because of inevitable shock. Contrastingly, of the remaining patients without ECG change, all 7 patients who experienced oversensing events could continue using S-ICD with the reprogramming sensing vector and/or restriction of excessive exercise. Logistic regression analysis showed that lower voltage of Sokolow-Lyon ECG (V1S + V5R) was the predictor of oversensing in patients without ECG change. When the cutoff value was 2.1 mV, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 85.7%, 62.7%, 15.7%, and 98.1%, respectively.
Conclusion:
Unavoidable oversensing resulting in S-ICD removal is caused by ECG change. Oversensing in patients without ECG change can be managed.
More Related Videos
10:17Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and...
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Instrumentation Amplifier
To overcome this challenge, an ECG machine utilizes an instrumentation amplifier. This specialized amplifier is...
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias I: Sinus Arrhythmias
Types of Arrhythmias
Sinus Node Arrhythmias
Sinus Bradycardia: Originating from the sinoatrial (SA) node, sinus bradycardia involves slower impulses, resulting in a heart rate of less than 60 beats per minute (bpm). Causes include sleep, vagal stimulation, beta-blockers, hypothyroidism,...