Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.9K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

35.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.4K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

16.2K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.2K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

45.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
45.3K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

28.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
28.5K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

28.3K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
28.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

More connections, higher polarization: The role of weak ties and status-driven dynamics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Unifying network connectivity from geodesics to random walks via the random cluster model.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

An AI-assisted, failure mode-based toolkit for proactive risk management in radiotherapy: A feasibility study.

Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence in radiation therapy: from imaging to delivery-a comprehensive review.

BJR artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Temporal heterogeneity shapes diffusion dynamics in complex networks.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A surface-conforming flexible collimator for improving electron radiotherapy.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Low-dimensional model for adaptive networks of spiking neurons [Phys. Rev. E 111, 014422 (2025)].

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Disentangling the effects of many-body forces on depletion interactions.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Charge transport and mode transition in dual-energy electron beam diodes.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Optimization of multisite reactions in complex compartmentalized media.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Origin of geometric cohesion in nonconvex granular materials: Interplay between interdigitation and rotational constraints enhancing frictional stability.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Interaction of walkers with a standing Faraday wave.

Physical review. E·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K

Consensus from group interactions: An adaptive voter model on hypergraphs.

Nikos Papanikolaou1, Giacomo Vaccario1, Erik Hormann2

  • 1ETH Zurich, Weinbergstrasse 58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.

Physical Review. E
|June 16, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Group interactions in a spin system with adaptable groups accelerate consensus and amplify opinion biases. This voter dynamics model shows magnetization drift, unlike basic models.

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.2K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

563

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.2K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

563

Area of Science:

  • Statistical mechanics
  • Complex systems
  • Social dynamics

Background:

  • Understanding consensus formation is key in social and physical systems.
  • Voter models explore opinion dynamics but often lack group adaptability.
  • Group structures significantly influence collective behavior and opinion spread.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how group interactions and adaptability affect consensus emergence in a spin system.
  • To analyze the role of group size heterogeneity (controlled by parameter β) in opinion dynamics.
  • To explore deviations from consensus conservation in adaptable group models.

Main Methods:

  • Agent-based modeling of a spin system with discrete opinions {0,1}.
  • Incorporation of voter dynamics within groups and group splitting/merging (adaptation).
  • Utilizing hypergraphs to represent heterogeneous group sizes and employing extensive computer simulations and analytical approaches for average magnetization.

Main Results:

  • Group interactions amplify initial opinion biases, accelerating consensus.
  • Adaptable group structures lead to a drift in average magnetization.
  • Conservation of initial magnetization is violated, differing from basic voter models.

Conclusions:

  • Group adaptability and size heterogeneity are critical factors in consensus dynamics.
  • The model provides a framework for understanding opinion formation in dynamic social networks.
  • Findings challenge traditional assumptions of magnetization conservation in opinion dynamics.