Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

589
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
589
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test01:19

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

534
The Mantel-Cox log-rank test is a widely used statistical method for comparing the survival distributions of two groups. It tests whether a statistically significant difference exists in survival times between the groups without assuming a specific distribution for the survival data, making it a non-parametric test. This flexibility makes the log-rank test particularly valuable in medical research and other fields where the timing of an event, such as death or disease recurrence, is of...
534
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

206
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
206
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

277
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
277
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

194
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
194
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.4K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Defective regression models for cure rate data with competing risks.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

Goodness of fit test for uniform distribution with censored observation.

Journal of the Korean Statistical Society·2023
Same author

A Generalized Measure of Cumulative Residual Entropy.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Estimation of distribution function in bivariate competing risk models.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2006
Same journal

Elastic functional Cox regression model with shape predictors.

Journal of applied statistics·2026
Same journal

An improved two-stage binary relevance method for multilabel classification.

Journal of applied statistics·2026
Same journal

Classification of multivariate functional data with an application to ADHD fMRI data.

Journal of applied statistics·2026
Same journal

Assessing the performance of longitudinal T-lymphocytes as biomarkers of immune recovery in HIV-infected children with or without TB co-infection.

Journal of applied statistics·2026
Same journal

Sparse long-only Markowitz portfolio optimization.

Journal of applied statistics·2026
Same journal

Homogeneity of multinomial populations when data are classified into a large number of groups.

Journal of applied statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K

Nonparametric inference for panel count data with competing risks.

E P Sreedevi1, P G Sankaran2

  • 1Department of Statistics, SNGS College, Pattambi, India.

Journal of Applied Statistics
|June 16, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new isotonic regression estimator and nonparametric test for analyzing competing risks panel count data. These methods help understand recurrent events in studies where subjects are observed at discrete time points.

Keywords:
Cause specific mean functioncompeting risksisotonic regression estimatormax-min formulapanel count data

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Survival Analysis
  • Reliability Engineering

Background:

  • Panel count data are crucial in survival and reliability studies when subjects are observed at discrete time points.
  • Competing risks arise when multiple types of recurrent events can occur, complicating continuous observation.
  • Such data are common in demography, epidemiology, and reliability experiments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an isotonic regression estimator for the cause-specific mean function in competing risks panel count data.
  • To introduce a nonparametric test for comparing cause-specific mean functions in this data type.
  • To analyze the asymptotic properties and finite sample behavior of the proposed methods.

Main Methods:

  • Development of an isotonic regression estimator for cause-specific mean functions.
  • Formulation of a nonparametric statistical test for comparing these functions.
  • Asymptotic analysis and simulation studies to validate the estimator and test.

Main Results:

  • The proposed isotonic regression estimator effectively models the cause-specific mean function.
  • The nonparametric test provides a valid approach for comparing these functions.
  • Simulation studies demonstrate good finite sample performance of both methods.

Conclusions:

  • The developed methods offer robust tools for analyzing competing risks panel count data.
  • The techniques were successfully applied to a real-world skin cancer chemoprevention trial.
  • This research advances the statistical analysis of recurrent events in discrete-time observational studies.