Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

12.2K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
12.2K
Data Collection by Experiments01:13

Data Collection by Experiments

25.1K
Data collection is a systematic method of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. An experimental study is a standard method of data collection that involves the manipulation of the samples by applying some form of treatment prior to data collection. It refers to manipulating one variable to determine its changes on another variable. The sample subjected to treatment is known as “experimental units.”
An example of the experimental method is a public...
25.1K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

3.0K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
3.0K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.9K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.9K
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

268
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
268
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of multiple annual biosolids applications on the soil concentrations of metals, organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in a field trial in Victoria, Australia.

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

A comparison of visual and molecular methods for inferring biological communities in aquaculture enriched sediments - Impact assessment and cost-benefit analysis.

Marine pollution bulletin·2024
Same author

Evaluating a Photogrammetry-Based Video for Undergraduate Anatomy Education.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 7, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K

Identifying communication spillovers in lab-in-the-field experiments.

Alexander Coutts1,2

  • 1Schulich School of Business, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3.

Journal of Development Economics
|June 17, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Communication between participants in field experiments can significantly increase cooperation, potentially biasing results. Researchers must develop protocols to manage these communication spillovers and ensure accurate findings in lab-in-the-field studies.

Keywords:
CommunicationDevelopmentField experimentsLab-in-the-fieldPublic goods gamesRwandaSUTVASocial learningSpillovers

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research
05:53

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

529
Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea
07:19

Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea

Published on: November 25, 2016

11.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 7, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K
Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research
05:53

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

529
Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea
07:19

Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea

Published on: November 25, 2016

11.6K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Development Economics
  • Experimental Economics

Background:

  • Lab-in-the-field experiments offer ecological validity but face challenges controlling external influences.
  • Communication spillovers between participants in sequential field experiments are poorly understood.
  • Existing literature shows inconsistent approaches to managing communication effects in field research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the impact of communication spillovers on participant behavior in public goods games.
  • To assess how communication between villages affects cooperation levels in a field setting.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for mitigating bias from communication spillovers.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized existing data from public goods games conducted in 147 villages in Rwanda.
  • Leveraged the sequential village visit order to identify villages with and without communication opportunities.
  • Employed ex-post matching to compare cooperation levels between villages exposed and unexposed to spillovers.

Main Results:

  • Communication spillovers led to substantial increases in cooperation among participants.
  • Unanticipated communication between villages significantly biased experimental inference.
  • The sequence of village visits created natural variation in exposure to communication.

Conclusions:

  • Communication spillovers are a critical factor influencing cooperation in field experiments.
  • Researchers must proactively design protocols to address and account for communication effects.
  • Careful consideration of experimental design is necessary to avoid biased results in similar settings.