Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

147
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
147
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

444
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
444

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding Mass Spectrometry: From Ion Generation to Spectral Interpretation.

Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS·2026
Same author

Probabilistic modelling of bilateral lymphatic spread in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma for personalised elective nodal treatment.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Mapping the Substrate Specificity Landscape of PAD2 and PAD4 Enzymes.

Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology·2026
Same author

Personalized volume de-escalated elective nodal irradiation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (DeEscO): a study protocol.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Fraction-variant VMAT planning for patients with complex gynecological and head-and-neck cancer.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Patterns of lymphatic spread in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and personalization of the elective clinical target volume.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.5K

Technical note: Optimal allocation of limited proton therapy resources using model-based patient selection.

Dávid Papp1, Jan Unkelbach2

  • 1Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Medical Physics
|June 18, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study optimizes proton therapy patient selection with limited daily slots by using a Markov decision process (MDP). The dynamic thresholds balance resource use and patient benefit, improving treatment allocation.

Keywords:
Markov decision processpatient selectionproton therapy

More Related Videos

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

2.9K
Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

1.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.5K
Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

2.9K
Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

1.5K

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Oncology
  • Medical Physics
  • Operations Research

Background:

  • Proton therapy offers advantages over photon therapy for certain cancers.
  • Limited daily slots in proton therapy clinics necessitate careful patient selection.
  • Maximizing patient benefit requires balancing slot availability with treatment efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an optimal patient selection strategy for proton therapy under limited resource constraints.
  • To minimize expected normal tissue complications and maximize proton therapy benefits.
  • To determine dynamic benefit thresholds for proton therapy allocation.

Main Methods:

  • Extended normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models to a limited resource scenario.
  • Formulated patient selection as a Markov decision process (MDP).
  • Utilized value-policy iteration to determine optimal benefit thresholds.

Main Results:

  • Optimal benefit thresholds are influenced by slot availability, patient load, and benefit distribution.
  • Thresholds dynamically adjust based on current facility utilization.
  • Lower thresholds are optimal when slots become available sooner.

Conclusions:

  • Markov decision process (MDP) methodology enhances NTCP-based selection for limited proton therapy slots.
  • Optimal thresholds are dynamic and depend on real-time facility utilization.
  • The proposed policy offers robustness against patient load variations with minimal nominal benefit loss.