Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

11:17
Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear
Published on: August 24, 2012
35.6K
Determinants of extinction in a streamed trial procedure
James E Witnauer1, Santiago Castiello2,3, Ethan Fung4
1State University of New York-Brockport, Brockport, NY, USA.
Summary
The frequency of extinction trials, not their duration, significantly impacts associative extinction. Increasing cue-alone event frequency reduces learned associations more effectively.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Learning and Memory
Background:
- Associative strength is determined by outcome probability given a cue and in its absence.
- Extinction reduces learned associations by presenting cues without outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how cumulative frequency and duration of extinction events affect associative extinction in humans.
- To determine the role of cue-alone and cue-outcome co-absence events in associative extinction.
Main Methods:
- Human participants underwent a streamed trial extinction procedure.
- Experiment 1 manipulated frequency and duration of cue-alone and cue-outcome co-absence events.
- Experiments 2 and 3 examined generalization and interactions with initial learning parameters.
Main Results:
- Participant sensitivity to event duration was low.
- Increased frequency of cue-alone events decreased associative judgements, even with equated cumulative cue exposure.
- Neither duration nor frequency of cue-outcome co-absence affected extinction.
Conclusions:
- Cumulative frequency of extinction trials is a key factor in reducing learned associations.
- Cumulative duration of extinction trials and cue-outcome co-absences do not significantly influence extinction effectiveness.
- Findings highlight the importance of extinction trial frequency in behavioral modification.
Related Concept Videos
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction
779
Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
779
Principles of Classical Conditioning
970
Classical conditioning, as described by Ivan Pavlov, is a foundational concept in associative learning, where a neutral stimulus becomes capable of eliciting a conditioned response through association with an unconditioned stimulus. The process of acquisition, where this learning occurs, and the subsequent phenomena of contiguity, contingency, generalization, discrimination, extinction, and spontaneous recovery are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of classical conditioning.
During the...
During the...
970
Law of Effect
1.6K
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
1.6K

