Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

08:53
Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
5.3K
Desistance, Disengagement, and Deradicalization: A Cross-Field Comparison
1Ghent University, Belgium.
Summary
This study compares criminal desistance and violent extremist disengagement, finding shared change mechanisms despite contextual differences. Integrating these fields deepens understanding of both crime and extremism.
Area of Science:
- Criminology and Political Science
- Focuses on the intersection of criminal behavior and violent extremism.
Background:
- Existing research on desistance from crime and disengagement/deradicalization from violent extremism remains largely separate.
- Violent extremism is posited as a form of crime, suggesting applicability of desistance frameworks to extremist offenders.
Approach:
- Conducts an integrative literature review comparing knowledge bases on criminal desistance and violent extremist disengagement.
- Traces the outlines of both bodies of knowledge to identify overlaps and divergences.
Key Points:
- Identifies common underlying mechanisms of change in studies of criminal desistance and violent extremist disengagement.
- Highlights how contextual variations influence the manifestation of these change mechanisms.
Conclusions:
- Demonstrates that criminal desistance and violent extremist disengagement share fundamental processes.
- Argues that a closer association between these fields enriches theoretical understanding of both phenomena.
- Suggests violent extremist offenders are amenable to desistance framework interventions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Radical Reactivity: Overview
2.2K
Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired...
2.2K
Cognitive Dissonance
33.5K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
33.5K
Deindividuation
27.2K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
27.2K
Radical Formation: Elimination
1.9K
Another method of radical formation is the elimination process. It is the opposite of the addition route and is driven by the instability of the radical. For example, as depicted in Figure 1, dibenzoyl peroxide yields a pair of unstable radicals upon homolysis. Given its instability, this radical spontaneously undergoes elimination via a C–C bond cleavage to form a relatively more stable phenyl radical. The mechanism involves cleavage of the bond between the α and β positions...
1.9K
Marcia's Theory of Identity Status
362
James Marcia's identity status model provides a framework for understanding how adolescents navigate identity formation through varying degrees of exploration and commitment. Marcia's model builds on Erik Erikson's theories of psychosocial development, focusing specifically on how adolescents reconcile individual aspirations with societal expectations. His model describes identity formation as a dynamic process where adolescents move between different states depending on their level...
362
Robbers Cave
14.4K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.4K

