Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spectral weighting of interaural time differences near the low-frequency dominant region in young and middle-aged adults.

JASA express letters·2026
Same author

Robotic Arm Assisted Slow Electrode Insertion and Simultaneous Measurement of Cochlear Microphonics in Cochlear Implantation.

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE·2026
Same author

Comprehensive Analysis of Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses using Fiber-Specific Modeling.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Localization of Free-Field Sound Sources in the Chronic Phase of Mild Ischemic Stroke.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Absorption Mode Broadband 2D MS for Proteomics and Metabolomics.

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry·2026
Same author

A cross-domain test battery for comprehensive hearing loss characterisation using functional, physiological, and vestibular measures.

International journal of audiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
07:00

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process

Published on: June 21, 2024

892

Considerations for Fitting Cochlear Implants Bimodally and to the Single-Sided Deaf.

Sabrina H Pieper1,2, Noura Hamze3, Stefan Brill4

  • 1Department of Medical Physics and Acoustic, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Trends in Hearing
|June 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Unilateral cochlear implant use with acoustic hearing in the other ear often leads to poorer binaural hearing. Addressing interaural mismatches in latency, frequency, and level is key for improving spatial hearing.

Keywords:
binaural fusioninteraural mismatchlateralization biasloudness balancingtonotopic mismatch

More Related Videos

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

426
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

534

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 7, 2025

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
07:00

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process

Published on: June 21, 2024

892
Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

426
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

534

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Audiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Binaural hearing and spatial abilities are diminished when one ear uses a cochlear implant (CI) and the other uses acoustic hearing.
  • This configuration is suboptimal compared to bilateral CI use or other forms of binaural stimulation.
  • A primary hypothesis suggests that binaural neurons require precisely matched inputs from both ears for optimal function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the causes of interaural mismatches in auditory input for combined CI-acoustic hearing.
  • To examine the perceptual consequences of these mismatches on spatial hearing.
  • To discuss experimental methods for measuring these mismatches and potential compensation strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on interaural mismatches in auditory processing.
  • Focus on three key dimensions: interaural latency, frequency, and level differences.
  • Analysis of stimulus-dependent nature of mismatches and their impact on perception.

Main Results:

  • Interaural mismatches in latency, frequency, and level are significant contributors to reduced binaural benefits.
  • Mismatches are often stimulus-dependent, complicating compensation efforts.
  • Compensation strategies need to consider individual patient needs and practical audiological fitting challenges.

Conclusions:

  • While some improvements in areas like speaker localization are possible with mismatch compensation, achieving comprehensive compensation is highly challenging.
  • Even with ideal fitting, performance in this CI-acoustic configuration is unlikely to surpass that of users with bilateral CIs.
  • Further research into advanced fitting procedures and compensation algorithms is warranted for this patient population.