Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neurophysiological Functional Connectivity Changes during Difficult Listening in Older and Younger Adults.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Very Early Cortical Auditory Responses to Speech in Humans.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Functional Connectivity Linked to Cognitive Recovery After Minor Stroke.

Annals of clinical and translational neurology·2025
Same author

Neural and Behavioral Changes in Older Adults from Auditory-Cognitive Training.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Neural recordings of continuous speech reveal robust signatures of prediction in second language learners of English.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

The Impacts of Two Adaptive Auditory-Cognitive Training Paradigms on Listening to Competing Talkers.

Seminars in hearing·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 7, 2025

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

8.5K

Algorithms for Estimating Time-Locked Neural Response Components in Cortical Processing of Continuous Speech.

Joshua P Kulasingham, Jonathan Z Simon

    IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering
    |June 21, 2022
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study compares Temporal Response Function (TRF) estimation methods for speech processing. Established and novel algorithms show comparable performance, with novel methods excelling in simulations but not real data.

    More Related Videos

    Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
    08:45

    Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

    Published on: October 24, 2012

    14.8K
    Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
    09:38

    Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

    Published on: January 29, 2014

    10.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Sep 7, 2025

    A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
    12:03

    A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

    Published on: May 25, 2019

    8.5K
    Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
    08:45

    Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

    Published on: October 24, 2012

    14.8K
    Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
    09:38

    Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

    Published on: January 29, 2014

    10.9K

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Computational Auditory Neuroscience
    • Signal Processing

    Background:

    • The Temporal Response Function (TRF) models neural activity linked to continuous stimuli like speech.
    • TRFs offer insights into speech processing in the brain, but single-subject component estimation can be unreliable.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the performance of established (ridge, boosting) and novel (Subspace Pursuit, Expectation Maximization) algorithms for Temporal Response Function (TRF) component estimation.
    • To evaluate algorithms that directly estimate TRF components using prior knowledge, bypassing full TRF estimation.

    Main Methods:

    • Compared ridge and boosting algorithms against novel Subspace Pursuit (SP) and Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithms.
    • Applied algorithms to single-channel, multi-channel, and source-localized TRFs using simulated and real magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data.
    • Evaluated performance based on model fit and accuracy of TRF component estimation.

    Main Results:

    • Ridge and boosting algorithms demonstrated comparable performance in TRF component estimation.
    • Novel SP and EM algorithms showed superior performance in simulations but not on real data, potentially due to unmet assumptions.
    • Ridge yielded slightly better model fits on real data than boosting, albeit with more spurious activity.

    Conclusions:

    • Both smooth (ridge) and sparse (boosting) algorithms are suitable for comparable TRF component estimation.
    • The novel SP and EM algorithms' accuracy depends on the validity of their assumptions regarding component characteristics.
    • This comparison aids in selecting robust algorithms for subject-specific speech processing research.