Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
How Do Accredited Organizations Evaluate the Quality and Effectiveness of Their Human Research Protection Programs?
Holly Fernandez Lynch1, Holly A Taylor2
1Department of Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Accredited organizations struggle to define and measure human research protection program quality. Recommendations include clearer definitions and a focus on participant outcomes for better HRPP effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Human research protection
- Institutional Review Boards
- Accreditation standards
Background:
- Evaluating the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency (QEE) of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and Human Research Protection Programs (HRPPs) is a recognized challenge.
- The Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP) requires accredited organizations to demonstrate HRPP QEE measurement and improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To understand how AAHRPP-accredited organizations interpret and meet the HRPP QEE standard.
- To identify strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in current HRPP QEE assessment approaches.
- To inform recommendations for improving HRPP quality evaluation.
Main Methods:
- Conducted 3 small-group interviews with 19 representatives from AAHRPP-accredited organizations.
- Participants were familiar with their organization's methods for satisfying the HRPP QEE standard.
- Interviews were conducted at the 2019 AAHRPP annual meeting.
Main Results:
- Participants lacked clear definitions for HRPP quality and effectiveness.
- Current QEE assessments often focus on turnaround time, compliance, and researcher satisfaction, with superficial evaluation of IRB members.
- Information on research subject experience was not central to QEE assessment, though efforts exist to incorporate patient, subject, and community perspectives.
- Stakeholder education and relationship-building were identified as key to high-quality HRPPs.
- Organizations expressed concerns about resource and time constraints leading to reactive rather than proactive QEE assessment.
Conclusions:
- The AAHRPP accreditation standard may obscure critical gaps in defining and measuring HRPP QEE.
- Recommendations for AAHRPP include providing a definition of QEE or requiring organizations to define it.
- A further recommendation is to require accredited organizations to establish QEE objectives and measures focused on participant outcomes and the deliberative quality of protocol review.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Quality Assurance
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:

