Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
New multi-criteria decision-making technique based on neutrosophic axiomatic design
Mohamed Abdel-Basset1, Mai Mohamed1, Nehal N Mostafa1
1Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Shaibet an Nakareyah, Zagazig, 44519, Ash Sharqia Governorate, Egypt.
This study introduces a novel neutrosophic multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for selecting Computed Tomography (CT) devices, effectively handling uncertainty in medical imaging evaluations.
Area of Science:
- Decision Sciences
- Medical Imaging Technology
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Traditional multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods struggle with the inherent uncertainty in selecting complex medical equipment.
- Accurate selection of Computed Tomography (CT) devices is crucial for effective medical decision-making and cost efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend MCDM methodologies into a neutrosophic environment for improved selection of Computed Tomography (CT) devices.
- To introduce a novel approach that accounts for uncertainty, truth, indeterminacy, and falsity in the evaluation process.
Main Methods:
- Development of a new linguistic scale using single-valued triangular neutrosophic numbers (SVTrN) for evaluating criteria and alternatives.
- Integration of axiomatic design (AD) principles within the neutrosophic MCDM framework.
- Application of the proposed method for selecting appropriate CT devices.
Main Results:
- The proposed neutrosophic MCDM approach effectively simulates human thinking by incorporating degrees of truth, indeterminacy, and falsity.
- Demonstrated superiority over existing methods in handling uncertainty within the CT device selection process.
- The approach offers a simpler yet more comprehensive evaluation compared to traditional MCDM techniques.
Conclusions:
- This research provides a valuable theoretical framework for addressing medical imaging system selection under uncertainty.
- The proposed method can enhance the value of medical imaging and reduce unnecessary costs for healthcare providers and policymakers.
- The study offers practical insights for governments and organizations in designing more effective medical imaging evaluation systems.
More Related Videos
07:05Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Factorial Design
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps: